@THE_RIPPER and the whole team:
A big thank you for you and the whole team for the great work on E2 for the azbox.
Is the image as well possible to use on the Head Medialink ML 9700 ?
The difference is the SIGMA Processor (SMP8655).
Is it possible to adapt the source ?
Please find technical facts below.
https://www.satpimps.co.uk/showpost....1&postcount=42
Best regards,
Samoth
No, this Enigma 2 is just for AzBox HD Receivers, and we will not support Head receivers, nor now nor in future....
Thank you for your response. Could you explain the reason a little bit more in detail ?Originally Posted by MickeySa
Is the difference between the two boxes so big ?
Are you intending to release the source code of your E2 development work ?
Best regards,
Samoth
There is no special reason, but decision is is one and explicite, there will be no support of medialink by our team.
i hope you will understand.
all of us in this team are azbox lovers and i think that in subforum about azbox there is no place for medialink.
Source code of E2 was always public ( opendreambox.org ). if You are asking for sources of drivers, they are not and will be not public.
Last edited by MickeySa; 20-10-2010 at 09:15 PM.
http://rapidshare.com/files/435608206/smp8654_mrua.zip
http://rapidshare.com/files/43558354...s-SDK-0.1.1.gz
http://rapidshare.com/files/43558354...oxTVSDK-0.2.gz
http://rapidshare.com/files/43558716..._Medialink.rar
to make your own Enigma for Medialink.
who can do it?
@nitrogen14 - Thank you for these useful tools!
Actually we don't need absolutely Enigma for our Medialink. For now, DVBAPI instead of OpenxCAS would be a good beginning.
So, if anybody is capable to help us developing DVBAPI on ML9700.... you're very welcome!
Visit us at sat ulc europe.
I too would have hoped for a DVB-API based firmware for this box (Idon't even have this box). It uses almost the same kernel as The Ripper's E2 and the SDK is based on much of the same code (special code for twin tuner). It would be a great gift to all the Medialink owners.
There are someone over at the networkedmediatank forum working on DVB-API for a box with the 8644 chip (not the same chip, but more of the same SDK code I think), so maybe there is still hope...
Best regards!
Last edited by digihoe; 09-12-2010 at 11:15 AM.
:king-041:another option, you can buy an Azbox and be part of this great community:king-041:
hahaha i love the part that we are azbox lovers, yeah i bite that :-)
one of my friedns have orderd the Medialink 9700 will be nice to see this against the Azbox , i will have the chance to test bot yet again, but i for one will not be holding my card on this, as it is Sigma what can we expect from this anyway.
same as Azbox with just diferent name or label.
Just a load off rubbish
Even play high stakes accusing a company off nothing getting back to you. ( the company you accused don't know your name and never had a email from you thats a fact! If you say it isn't I dare you to send them a email again with the proper info )
You're in the same league as Terroman and CO wich seem to be rather quite last weeks since E2 is here for Azbox.
But for all others:
RTI team developes E2 for Azbox not Medialink
ADMIN !
PLEASE CLOSE THE THREAD !:beatdeadhorse5::beatdeadhorse5: :beatdeadhorse5::beatdeadhorse5:: beatdeadhorse5::beatdeadhorse5::b eatdeadhorse5::beatdeadhorse5::be atdeadhorse5:
another confirmation of how opensat is using opensource tools and public information to gain its commercial profits.
shame on you! remember the times when we just FEED you with tools for sigma? now that's how you deal with developers for other sigma cpu's. :nopity:
All a load of nonsense. The Azbox Enigma2 team is doing an excellent job for Azbox users. Why on earth would they want to waste valuable time on another receiver?
As for Opensat, I commend them on their support of the Enigma2 project, and even though I am still quite happy with the OpenSat f/w (and I'm not the only one) I really enjoy watching and testing the developments of Enigma2.
please keep this on the subject it was first posted about thanks.
May i ask who delited my replay to Carp96 and to the other guy that give trouble ? can i at list get an explanation on PM why that was delited ?
If my post was delited then why not the Post of Carp95 ? my post was mainly directed to him just to give him an reel answer :-)
I do not care why and who delited, as maybe was for the best this way, and i will respect MOD/ADMIN desition but a small explanation will do it is job.
anyway back on topic, why will some one give you his bread or his job to make images for other boxes. I think the Germans need to do something them selfs for this He@d box, but if some one can do it in record time then will be for sure the Germans.
Azboz is an Nice piece of hardware but the part that is terrible is the Software.
I have tested the He@d Medi@link ML 9700 side by side with Azbox Premium + and when i say same s**t difernet name this is what i mean.
they both are good boxes in hardware sence, but software isw crap on both.
As for the Enigma2 part, as others have posted here some files then cannot be so dificult for those that can to port Enigma2.
Anyway i do not care about none of this boxes, and will not advise to any one to buy this boxes as they are just plain headiche for any one and the software makes you go crazy.
so what are you doing in this thread
i believe that:
1) rti team is not obligated to give any of his work @ public since it is their job/effort/creation/loss of time/etc.
2)if opensat or azbox official company helped or helping rti team with source code or anything else that is also for their commercial benefit thus rti is also benefited and ,since they publish their work and we have beta fw OUR benefit
3)@ all of you that ask for help from rti team: i think you have the wrong approach
personally if i was one of the rti team (i am not) i would first produce a perfect firmware, bug free and then i would consider jumping to another stb
Last edited by nstergi; 11-12-2010 at 02:06 PM.
It was me who edited your post to bring it back on track simples.
And if the boxes are so bad can you not post a youtube video of said box. At least have something to back it up with.
@illuminati. he is entitles to his opion me old mucker same as everyone else
have you ever tried at least compile something for sigma?
I bet you don't so I'm sorry but you don't know how actually toolkit works and how to make a firmware. I've tried. Im not considering myself a guru but I have some 15 years experience in Unix systems and do know some things. It's not a big deal to compile ported enigma for other cpu 6855 - Medialink in that case. nitrogen14 just posted half of stuff for it - a toolkit and guess sigma keys. Anyway that lad was not asking for complete image - he asked for dvbapi. not a big deal and could be a great contribution for friendly people from other forum that are fighting (as most of us) with this Pandora's box - Sigma CPU and were asking for help. I could say more of that... guess they have their own developers or enthusiasts and they can help together make azbox better.
Last edited by tx0; 11-12-2010 at 05:55 PM. Reason: spelling
no i don't, i have complete ignorance.i don't know what a toolkit is.
i am not even a windows guru actually.
so i don't demand anything from rti team.
i can only demand from azbox official company, it is their product i purchased.
from rti team i just kindly request.
and i am happy that some progress is done.
but i am free to post my opinion with my little English.
i will not flame
bye
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks