The zapping of D + to D + HD crashes ALWAYS
The zapping DVBS to DVBS2 crashes 90% of times
Only audio, no video. And within five seconds, locks.
Any solution?
The zapping of D + to D + HD crashes ALWAYS
The zapping DVBS to DVBS2 crashes 90% of times
Only audio, no video. And within five seconds, locks.
Any solution?
Last edited by AAOM; 26-11-2010 at 02:45 PM.
No sarcasm from me,I just proposed the validity of a situation,not wishing it to happen.
I am so optimistic that I do not even post bugs knowing others will be more interested in doing that.
No pressure from me to you guys.
But I am realistic also,there are things that might stop the development,or you are going to tell me this didn't happen to Opensat ???
Because it is clear they had/have no clue how to make the thing work as it should.
Kudos to you guys and keep it up.
if I go I see the info CrossEPG creation time how big the file,
channel number 296
33901 events
13018 keys
but I still do not see anything about multi epg chart.
could be the problem are the settings? use those of Hannibal.
decoder elite firmware RTi core 1.0.1 BETA
hello
For all...
The best is tu use Bug tracking website, so You can select in Operatin system Your model, and ofcourse, there is version 1.0.1 ....
Sorry.
Azbod Hd Elite with firmware RTi core 1.0.1 beta.
I test with last firmware of DSteam with identical problem.
I test with CCcam 2.1.3, 2.2.0 and 2.2.1.
I test with multiple chanels list -Daconi, sofrenic and others-
I changed video config to DVI, components, ... and i test with 1080i or 720p==> same problem.
Sorry for my english
Regards.
MickeySA that is huge news, from what i understand "interlace fix" will fix fast movements and also improve hugely image quality right?
it should behave like autoresolution plugin? Since that plugin improves quality by a mile.
We would appreciate if you had the time to tell us the improvements in interlace fix
Can't wait for next update/release
Will this be released by modules in software update, or new team image?
The_Ripper
MickeySA
I am having problems installing project-valerie in latest releases. in DSteam image based on yours 3.0.1 it works. But not in original 3.0.1
After moicas help and tests and some talk to project-valerie guys they said this:
You are missing the *******Summary class which is part of e2 since forever.
http://git.opendreambox.org/?p=enigm...perimental#l18
File "/usr/lib/enigma2/python/Plugins/Extensions/ProjectValerie/DMC_******.py", line 1, in <module>
from Screens.****** import ******Summary
ImportError: cannot import name ******Summary
----------------------------------------------------------
Could u guys fix/support this again please?
Or could u guys tell me a quickfix to solve this please?
Thank you.
EDIT: after some try this and that, here is the fix:
http://www.4shared.com/file/MztqTPZu/******.html
upload those files to:
/usr/lib/enigma2/python/Screens/
Project Valerie working!![]()
Last edited by hfmls; 26-11-2010 at 08:18 PM.
Hello,
please forgive me, all of you, if this question has been answered before, but I have tried and searched and have not found an answer.
I would like to take part in trying and testing e2 image. But as long as the multimedia part is not fully working, I need to go back to original FW ever so often. I am running KGD 4890 on my AZPremium for some time now. I would not like to lose the EPG for instance, and I have installed the ipkg system and some more.
My question now: when, after testing, I go back to KGD4890, is the internal HD untouched, or are there links etc. rewritten for getting e2 running? In short: does the go-back-process mean reinstalling the original KGD4890 and rebuilding my current state or can I start re-using it right away?
Mike
Hi Mike,
you have to differ "internal HD" and "DOM". The DOM (this 256MB Flash-Memory) will be erased if you install enigma2 on it. In this case your KGD on DOM is lost. But with AzUp 1.2.5 you can install enigma2 on a memory stick. In that case your KGD on DOM will be left untouched and only the kernel in internal flash will be changed. Your HD (your HardDisk) will be untouched in both cases.
IMHO the best way for you is installing E2 on a memory stick. So you have to replace the kernel only (with AzUp) if you want to change between KGD and E2.
Enjoy testing![]()
Last edited by richy18; 26-11-2010 at 10:34 PM.
Thanks Richy for your explanation. I guess I will try the memory stick option then. But i assume perfomance will be rather bad when running from USB stick or has USB port throughput improved under e2?
Mike
What was the point of creating a Bug Tracker on azbox-enigma.eu if the post gets deleted?
I reported a "Feature Request" for DVB-T support. and marked it with "medium priority"
I read through the other post before I reported it, and none had reported it yet.
The report Id was "ID28"
I understand if it was deleted because several asked for the same thing, but I can not see that anyone have asked for this.
If it was deleted because it was fixed then the "Progress bar" should have been updated to 100% and not deleted.
For me this is not a big deal, but I'd like to know why.
Can anyone help me understand why it was deleted?
Last edited by leif666; 27-11-2010 at 12:58 AM.
Bug Tracker is only for reported bugs.
Not to make requests.
DVB-T, DVB-C, Recording, Internal Reader, etc... are not bugs.
Normal everything bugs than delete it.
I think it is better to close this thread,as far as it adds no value to the development,it is best to Using bug tracking web site so as mickeySa has said. To create a peace again,Some things have all been answered, it still makes no sense to repeat things. if something changes, this is also clearly stated in the change log. such as DVB-T or DVB-C is known to all. and these are not bugs they simply are not added. this is my opinion.:victory-045:
Last edited by Abdul1508; 27-11-2010 at 01:49 AM.
ok, I have no problems understanding that, but then the "Feature Request" button should have been removed.
The way I understood it was also possible to ask for a Feature Request by using the ""Feature Request" button.
I think you understand why it is a bit confusing.
What should the "Feature Request" be used for then?
Should I use it to Request a Feature bug? :chinese-bow-005:
Edit:
Great that the team have made the Bug list, keep up the good work :-) I hope that we also can use this to make requests In the future.
It's a very straightforward and easy way to do it :-)
Last edited by leif666; 27-11-2010 at 01:53 AM.
Bookmarks