Page 18 of 178 FirstFirst ... 816171819202868118 ... LastLast
Results 341 to 360 of 3542

Thread: Enigma 2 by The_ripper - TEST -

  1. #341
    V.I.P hfmls's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    hmm so this means LAN speed improvement only for FTP transfers.
    if we want to watch massive bitrate movie over lan, no luck then.
    but still, much better performance i figure then current original firmware.

  2. #342
    Junior Member milix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    KGDTeam
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    hmm so this means LAN speed improvement only for FTP transfers.
    if we want to watch massive bitrate movie over lan, no luck then.
    but still, much better performance i figure then current original firmware.
    Reply With Quote
    The problem is that all 86xx Sigma Chipset does not have a dedicated LAN chipset and the CPU can not work more speed, so Celrun BUS has a limit on data from the CPU, if it were not limited and for example would like to upload a file FTP the receiver would be unmanageable very very slow.

    The sigma chipset 86xx can not work more than 5 mb / s this speed the system is very slow, it azbox I do not say I have a popcorn and hands the same, but they do not have tuners, cams, etc ... can go a little faster than a popcorn but little more.

    For this problem Azbox not work well with multimedia files(mkv) over a network, and hardly do in the future, but if you can get to work with media files from HDD without using the LAN or some USB.

    The only way to get everything working correctly is to make a firmware that has a system that is very lightweight and consumes very little resources (CPU + RAM), perhaps E2 is the solution.

    The current firmware Celrun-Opensat consumes too many resources and can not do this sigma.

    Bye.
    Last edited by milix; 31-08-2010 at 08:43 AM.

  3. #343
    V.I.P buyukbang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Istanbul / Turkey
    Posts
    354
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    AFAIK, there are ethernet adapters that has own proccessor to handle network traffic? Can we use one of them through USB port instead of built in card, with E2? There should be Dreambox drivers for that, may be a port needed? Just thinking loudly, no exact knowledge....


    Quote Originally Posted by milix View Post
    The problem is that all 86xx Sigma Chipset does not have a dedicated LAN chipset and the CPU can not work more speed, so Celrun BUS has a limit on data from the CPU, if it were not limited and for example would like to upload a file FTP the receiver would be unmanageable very very slow.

    The sigma chipset 86xx can not work more than 5 mb / s this speed the system is very slow, it azbox I do not say I have a popcorn and hands the same, but they do not have tuners, cams, etc ... can go a little faster than a popcorn but little more.

    Bye.

  4. #344
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    82
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    For what is the seperated network chip in azbox?
    It s a realtek rtl8201.

  5. #345
    V.I.P
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    384
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    And the WiFi mini-PCI card...?

    Speed cap at the system bus?

  6. #346
    V.I.P hfmls's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    usb wireless N. i would like that.

  7. #347
    V.I.P buyukbang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Istanbul / Turkey
    Posts
    354
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    If azbox has a separate network adapter chip Realtek rtl8201 on its ethernet adapter (not using directly sigma CPU), and if there is a limit for CPU bus speed, then this limit must apply for the HDD, too? Right? With this equation, theoretically, we can reach to the max possible speed with network adapter same as we can reach with HDD?

    Quote Originally Posted by milix View Post
    The problem is that all 86xx Sigma Chipset does not have a dedicated LAN chipset and the CPU can not work more speed, so Celrun BUS has a limit on data from the CPU, if it were not limited and for example would like to upload a file FTP the receiver would be unmanageable very very slow.

    The sigma chipset 86xx can not work more than 5 mb / s this speed the system is very slow, it azbox I do not say I have a popcorn and hands the same, but they do not have tuners, cams, etc ... can go a little faster than a popcorn but little more.

    For this problem Azbox not work well with multimedia files(mkv) over a network, and hardly do in the future, but if you can get to work with media files from HDD without using the LAN or some USB.

    The only way to get everything working correctly is to make a firmware that has a system that is very lightweight and consumes very little resources (CPU + RAM), perhaps E2 is the solution.

    The current firmware Celrun-Opensat consumes too many resources and can not do this sigma.

    Bye.
    Quote Originally Posted by pascha99 View Post
    For what is the seperated network chip in azbox?
    It s a realtek rtl8201.

  8. #348
    Junior Member milix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    KGDTeam
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    All data passing through the same bus, HDD, USB, LAN, etc. .. Celrun put a limit on the BUS for the system to block and Opensat never has said it has no solution for that reason the application has created Opensat Hardware Acceleration which increases the data bus and the CPU speed is one Overclock This will greatly improve the traffic data by the BUS.

    As we know the USB is also limited in the bus, if we connect a LAN USB (rtl8201) would work via USB NETWORK ie all the information and pass for that port official also very slow.

    The USB HDD if it is (Elite) is very slow, however the HDD of a premium (SATA) works very fast, and reproduction in high bibrate mkv for example is very good with the TCK on.

    But if I can say from the evidence that has been made that for example a 7200 SATA HDD 32MB buffer is not optimal speed that should have.

    Many of the solution would have problems with some hardware tweaks, other do not.

    Bye.

  9. #349
    V.I.P hfmls's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    but....has u noticed, they could run via USB a 40mb/S bitrate m2ts movie, enigma2 testing ...

    if this has a limit, is a damn big one

  10. #350
    V.I.P zeini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    455
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I think this means 40 mbit/sec, this are 5 MByte/sec. This is very slow for an usb. But I would be happy to have this speed on the LAN.

  11. #351
    V.I.P hfmls's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    no, blueray bitrates are 40MB not mbit, sometimes more or less.
    its way way heavier then mkv .
    it's like mkv = xvid and m2ts it's like a .vob file. (no compression)

    so we're good playing mkv in future with enigma2.
    really good.

  12. #352
    V.I.P
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    255
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    milix is right about all things, thats why they added HW Acceleration option, or better to say they incrase x.pll3 value that affect CPU speed and thats how you got much faster transfer on LAN/USB after you set this option.

    @hfmls High bitrates should work if you code good app that use very good pre buffering technics

  13. #353
    V.I.P hfmls's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    ok, that means u guys coded a good app media player..since u got to work pefect a high bitrate m2ts.

  14. #354
    V.I.P
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    509
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by hfmls View Post
    no, blueray bitrates are 40MB not mbit, sometimes more or less.
    it's 40Mbits and NOT 40MB...

  15. #355
    V.I.P hfmls's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    sorry, i was completed confused
    but, anyway, that's pretty high and good bitrate for azbox to handle.

  16. #356
    Senior Member massimo1167's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    249
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Ripper View Post
    Image is build with Makefile-opendreambox-1.5 for dm800(didnt try new OE 1.6), but for e2 to works, it will need some patches. I will try to upload main diff/write here what I changed.
    Have You tried with new OE 1.6 yet?
    Do you think there will be problems with the new OE?
    Which kernel release are You using?
    Do You believe that we can use the new kernel for USB DVB T-tuner recognition ?

    Thanks 1K for all Your efforts!!!

  17. #357
    V.I.P
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    255
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    @massimo1167
    --Yes , OE 1.6 is booting up, but in more scripts are necessary changes then from OE 1.5
    --Currently it's 2.6.22.19 , there is new kernels but problem is Sigma left support for Tango2(8634 chips) in new kernels and I think now(I am not shure) patches isnt in GPL anymore
    --I hope we can, but that I will know when I finish demux part and how USB speed will affect all thing ...

  18. #358
    V.I.P hfmls's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    The_Ripper currently what are you working on? From what u said u finished audio and video part right? And u have a team working with u finishing media-player part.

    Again we can't thank you enough.
    Keep up awesome work.

  19. #359
    V.I.P
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    255
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    @hfmls
    Activating Sigma HW demux part+tuner.

  20. #360
    V.I.P hfmls's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,819
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Ripper View Post
    @hfmls
    Activating Sigma HW demux part+tuner.
    That means tunner driver is done?
    Or the coding process is together? While u code tunner driver u activate sigma hw demux part?


    From what u tell us probably next alpha image will already have tunner and dvbapi support?


    btw...take your time of course.
    Last edited by hfmls; 31-08-2010 at 10:32 PM.

Page 18 of 178 FirstFirst ... 816171819202868118 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •