yes, you do a lot. 13 posts, all of them top quality.
does anyone know if this software is the same author that created enigma2 video?
yes, you do a lot. 13 posts, all of them top quality.
does anyone know if this software is the same author that created enigma2 video?
I d`t understand it :
y.testvar yamonfoo
y.b0 nflash read 0x080000 0xa4a00000 0x040000 0; dump romfs 0xa4a00000; load zbf 0xa4a00080; go
y.b1 nflash read 0x0c0000 0xa7000000 0x740000 0; dump romfs 0xa7000000; load zbf 0xa7000090; go
y.b2 nflash read 0x000000 0xa4a00000 0x080000 0; dump romfs 0xa4a00000; load zbf 0xa4a00080; go
y.fb0 nflash read 0x080000 0x84a00000 0x040000 0; dump romfs 0x84a00000; load zbf 0x84a00080; go
y.fb1 nflash read 0x0c0000 0x87000000 0x740000 0; dump romfs 0x87000000; load zbf 0x87000090; go
y.fb2 nflash read 0x480000 0x84a00000 0x080000 0; dump romfs 0x84a00000; load zbf 0x84a00080; go
y.spug load uu 0xa4a00000; cksum 0xa4a00000 0x20000; nflash erase -p 0 0x20000 0; nflash write -p 0 0xa4a00000 0x20000 0; nflash read -p 0 0xa4a00001 0x20000 0; cksum 0xa4a00001 0x20000
y.pug load -b tftp://172.30.2.212/8644_ES2/phyblock0-latest-0x20000padded.947-E2 0xa4a00000; cksum 0xa4a00000 0x20000; nflash erase -p 0 0x20000 0; nflash write -p 0 0xa4a00000 0x200000; nflash read -p 0 0xa4a00001 0x20000 0; cksum 0xa4a00001 0x20000
y.yug load -b tftp://172.30.2.212/8644_ES2/zbimage-yamon-xload-latest-0x40000padded 0xa4a00000; cksum 0xa4a00000 0x40000; nflash write 0x80000 0xa4a00000 0x40000 0; nflash read 0x80000 0xa4a00001 0x40000 0; cksum 0xa4a00001 0x40000
y.lug load -b tftp://172.30.2.212/8644_ES2/zbimage-linux-xload-latest-0x500000padded 0xa7000000; cksum 0xa7000000 0x500000; nflash write 0xc0000 0xa7000000 0x500000 0; nflash read 0xc0000 0xa7000001 0x500000 0; cksum 0xa7000001 0x500000
y.imu load -b tftp://172.30.2.212/imaterial/imaterial.romfs.latest 0xa7000000; nflash erase 0x00800000 0x00900000 0; nflash write 0x00800000 0xa7000000 0x00900000 0; nflash read 0x00800000 0xa7000010 0x00900000 0; dump romfs 0xa7000010
y.xmu load -b tftp://172.30.2.212/xmaterial/xmaterial.romfs.latest 0xa4a00000; nflash erase 0x01800000 0x00200000 0; nflash write 0x01800000 0xa4a00000 0x00200000 0; nflash read 0x01800000 0xa4a00010 0x00200000 0; dump romfs 0xa4a00010
y.pugUNSTABLE load -b tftp://172.30.2.212/ES2/phyblock0-UNSTABLE-0x20000padded 0xa4a00000; cksum 0xa4a00000 0x20000; nflash erase -p 0 0x20000 0; nflash write -p 0 0xa4a00000 0x20000 0; nflash read -p 0 0xa4a00001 0x20000 0; cksum 0xa4a00001 0x20000
y.commit nflash read -p 0 0xa4a00000 0x20000 0; copy $xenv_addr 0xa4a00000 0x4000; nflash erase -p 0 0x20000 0; nflash write -p 0 0xa4a00000 0x20000 0çy.ub go 0xa00e5284
y.nwk load -b tftp://172.30.2.212/ES2/vmlinux-latest.bin 0x84000000
y.nwg go . root=/dev/nfs nfsroot=172.30.63.13:/roots/debinst-yourlogin ip=::::::dhcp rdinit=/none console=ttyS0 mem=135MB
What should be the log?Originally Posted by Gennadyi
Since your first post, my first opinion is that you seem a kind of few words :-)
I agree with you, but this is capitalism as well, Azbox doesn't want to pay **** because they are too greedy to pay any development for Enigma2, so they hope some dumbass will come out with a finished Enigma2 for Azbox for free so they can sell loads of boxes.
The guy developing the E2 waits for the money, money will never come and the project dies.
As i have used to own the IPBOX i know how long it took for E2 to become usable from the first day it was released.
My suggestion even if it hurts is to buy a Dreambox and forget about all problems all other boxes got, problem being that all forums are so boring these days as they are all focused at dreamboxes and cccam.
Last edited by Likvid; 13-04-2010 at 01:43 PM.
I think this will be what we all need to do, on azbox or other box, :respect-057:
But looks like we still have a problem!!
We don't have FULL SRC, then... may be 1º option buy to Celrun Full SRC, but and I'm gessing, they will don't sell it... rrrrrrrrrrrr
What to do???
Hihihihi ... Yeap m8's this is not so easy like we all think, like I already post here, only with help of opensat or celrun, this can be possible!!!
Anyway, where is the GPL code from Opensat/celrun???????????????
And do you now any svn, cvs, git public the all src we all see on Uploaders???
I don't like the Dream Multimedia monopoly, and I always looked for alternatives, I have a TM600 and a AzBox Elite, the hardware is good, but the software is crappy.
DGStation, AzBox, ITGate/Technomate, Qbox, Kathrein have good hardware, but crapy software.
Dreambox crapy hardware, but good software.
In the end Dreambox works better, and does what is meant to do. My DM800 clone should arrive today.
Why is so hard for DM competitors invest in software?
I think it's easier to build a nice receiver and don't care about it after it's done...
because software is made by intelligent people and hardware is cloned by chinese
Yep, i would like the answer to that also.
Sometimes you think most often the opposite rules, stupid developers and bright smart hardware makers.
Azbox tried to make a great box hardware wise but failed totally in the software department.
Why is it so hard for all of these manufacturers to make good alternative software? Enigma2 isn't the greatest either and fail miserably in the mediacenter section.
Last edited by Likvid; 13-04-2010 at 04:33 PM.
The problems is that Opensat can't release the source code, because it is not from them. It's from sigma.
Opensat greedy or not doesn't matter. They cant release the souce code of sigma chip.
Guys do you remember armas and triple dragon.TD was a nice receiver with it's own software with a locked code,better than enigma.AZBOX software is very close to td and looks like a td when you use it.The problem with td and with azbox are emus and specific CCcam.At all the others they are better than any enigma boxes. And as I can tell you for my personal opinion more stable than dreamboxes (I own a td ,a dm800 ,an Azbox and an ipbox 200s .Trust me azbox is more stable.At the field of speed with exeption of enigma 1 boxes and TD ,Azbox and dm800 are at the same level.DM 800 have better user interface but does less thinks and have Promlems with mkv and 720p 1020p movies,lack of wirlesslan,lack of second tuner ,lack of second scart ,lack of hdmi
(pure) and of course very expensive 440E versus 345E of azbox.Remember dm 800 get a stable firmware after second stage 72 (after 1,5 year in production line).
Be patient and ask for a better original firmware and more emu developement and if e2 comes then it maybe give us another option.
Last edited by toulker; 13-04-2010 at 04:40 PM.
I'm sorry but I disagree!
If opensat has chosen this platform had to know what they were getting.
Now or opensat create a new valid development team of original firmware or find a way out to solve the obvious problems about original firmware.
I'm not entirely sure it was a coincidence that on the official forum have been lost all the old threads, certainly were erased all traces of their several bulky (You know it could also sound like a bad publicity for those who are willing to buy their decoder).
I almost agree with You, I think isn't a emu problem, there are a lot of other problems...
But I agree with You we need a better original firmware!!!
:respect-069: You said almost everything :respect-046:
Just forget 2 things:
The wonderful job made by seife, adding Neutrino to TD and with new Neutrino-HD you have a PPC box with PVR stuff, 1000%, I can't watch HD channels because of hardware but can scan them.With blind scan!
And pallas looks like open sat because the two are Europen Comp's.
But Pallas have only Europen Coders, some of them are now in the SH4 plataform.
:sifone:
Is this e2 booting log? Or bootloader changing procedure log?
Youre have "on" status so write some letters.
I thought the neutrino image from TD goes from hdd or compact flash and not from internal flash, or am i wrong?:respect-069: You said almost everything :respect-046:
Just forget 2 things:
The wonderful job made by seife, adding Neutrino to TD and with new Neutrino-HD you have a PPC box with PVR stuff, 1000%, I can't watch HD channels because of hardware but can scan them.
And pallas looks like open sat because the two are Europen Comp's.
But Pallas have only Europen Coders, some of them are now in the SH4 plataform.
:sifone:
and does Broadcom release the source code for their chips? of course they do.
Something is fishy here with DMM.
Anyway, the Triple Dragon was the best thing released in years, i loved using that receiver, the receiver felt very solid in it's construction.
Last edited by Likvid; 13-04-2010 at 09:22 PM.
maybe we just need to get a job at opensat then leak the source code get them CVs in lol jobs@opensat.net rofl:respect-055:
I am surprised the CCcam source code hasn't leaked yet, it must be only 1 person in that project or two at maximum.
If source code leaked i am sure people would be more relaxed on the forums.
@ the ripper
@ hfmls
@ all others
I found this file "directfb source code for smp8634" on some old site: swik.n.t, not sure if it was attached in old posts.... hope it can help dev's
Sory for the big file size (more than 15 mb)
:cheers2:
Public License Sourcecode Release Page
w*w.networkedmediatank.com/download/firmware/nmt/gpl/gpl.htm
the new glibc sdk is almost done i planned to release it on sunday.Also im not sure capasity of azbox's dfb for E2 because it connected mrau.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks