Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Best yet tm nano 3t

  1. #1
    V.I.P
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    663
    Thanks
    380
    Thanked 106 Times in 76 Posts

    Best yet tm nano 3t

    bought this tm nano 3t after all the help I got from everyone sitting up I want to say well worth the extra cost for all the extra features you get its fantastic. People don't no what they missing if you thinking of changing your box think hard to buy this one guys

  2. #2
    V.I.P skomedal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,573
    Thanks
    426
    Thanked 1,203 Times in 546 Posts
    All well and good but what satellites and TPs are you able to receive.

    How good does it perform on fringe reception satellites and tight beam/footprint TPs from your location?

    Your post #1 fails to mention these attributes

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to skomedal For This Useful Post:

    holmroad (08-04-2015)

  4. #3
    Cool Dude holmroad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    6,295
    Thanks
    4,176
    Thanked 1,955 Times in 1,266 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by den123 View Post
    bought this tm nano 3t after all the help I got from everyone sitting up I want to say well worth the extra cost for all the extra features you get its fantastic. People don't no what they missing if you thinking of changing your box think hard to buy this one guys :respect
    'Which' extra features do you mean den?

  5. #4
    V.I.P Aldo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    6,062
    Thanks
    5,587
    Thanked 5,016 Times in 2,265 Posts
    'Which' extra features do you mean den?

    That should make interesting reading, if he ever gets around to giving us all of the details on what we have been missing, and further more he thinks so highly of this receiver that he keeps asking when the " New Spiderbox 6000 " will be available.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Aldo For This Useful Post:

    echelon (08-04-2015)

  7. #5
    V.I.P manic01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,688
    Thanks
    2,233
    Thanked 3,700 Times in 1,823 Posts
    The tm 3t is cable/sat/terrerstrial, spiderbox will hardly compare.
    Loads of plugins etc like any e2 stb available.
    He also has TM5402 which he likes.
    All these stb's do different things for different people, all down to requirements.

  8. #6
    V.I.P Aldo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    6,062
    Thanks
    5,587
    Thanked 5,016 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by manic01 View Post
    The tm 3t is cable/sat/terrerstrial, spiderbox will hardly compare.
    Loads of plugins etc like any e2 stb available.
    He also has TM5402 which he likes.
    All these stb's do different things for different people, all down to requirements.
    The point I was making is if he has the TM 3T and the TM 5402, why then did he start the following thread:

    https://www.satpimps.co.uk/showthrea...spiderbox-6000

    and BTW I was not suggesting that the Spiderbox was in any way comparable.

  9. #7
    V.I.P manic01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,688
    Thanks
    2,233
    Thanked 3,700 Times in 1,823 Posts
    He probably likes playing with new boxes and as spiderbox are always cheap not much of an outlay required.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to manic01 For This Useful Post:

    Aldo (08-04-2015), holmroad (08-04-2015)

Similar Threads

  1. Tm nano t3 how to
    By den123 in forum Technomate TM-NANO-OE
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 25-03-2015, 09:23 PM
  2. nano t3 e2
    By spidersat in forum Technomate TM-NANO-OE
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17-02-2015, 03:58 PM
  3. TM-Nano feedback
    By heyho in forum Technomate TM-NANO-OE
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-04-2014, 08:11 AM
  4. nano faq
    By drpaulos in forum Other Receivers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 26-08-2008, 01:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •