Printable View
IMAGE QUALITY AND INTERLACE MAKES ME WANNA CRY :) :) :) :D:D:D:D
I never seen such a good image in a receiver!! I was expecting improvement when u told about interlace MickeySA, but this seems like a htpc i had with "vector adaptive" option on using ATI card.
Using 1080p@50hz
Quality is superb!!
Thank you MickeySA for answer, i thought this plugin was "optimized" for enigma2 in azbox hd. i will try to install other version. Do u have any link to daily builds please? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeySa
BTW read my previous post.
CLOCK is still bad :( too fast.
I see, MotionAdaptative deinterlace is working perfectly, thanks for fast report !
CrossEPG working:
update plugin from here:
http://code.google.com/p/crossepg/downloads/list
then mounted my usb-HDD into hdd
"mount /dev/sda1 /media/hdd"
epg working now.
i am now trying to initiate /dev/sci0 but oscam can't do it..
MickeySA what ere your tests regarding sci0?
Should i put sci0 or scard or what?
Thank you very much :)
I didnt test Card reader at all so I cant tell You really nothing... :S
try to see if there is device under /dev/sci0
or
cat /proc/devices
if there is just /dev/sc0 , try this by telnet :
ln -s /dev/sc0 /dev/sci0
No sci0, only sc0, after doing "ln -s /dev/sc0 /dev/sci0 "Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeySa
nothing happened.
No sci0, still only sc0.
the TEAM rocks, Nice :respect-057: :party:
you guys are making leaps 'N' bounds with ur project :party:
hello hfmlsQuote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
as you said picture is superb is that a sure or a fast reply as your
date is waiting :respect-057:
can we change the resolution now or we still have to do it FTP
i tried the last DS image and the picture was so bad that it also made me want to cry.
but to be honest the plugins and handeling in DS were very good
honestly i changed to 1080p via FTP.it is way faster i only have to change 720p to 1080p via text. :) I didn't test via GUI.
I am zapping right now,trying to find bugs, quality is amazing, it is better than dm800 and original azbox hd firmware. SD and HD. Without any doubts.
after an hour or so, here are my tests:
- i can't seem to initiate sci0 with oscam, it gives me an error all the time. Gotta test some more.But it appears to NOT be working, sci0 doesn't sho up in cat /proc/devices
- CrossEPG is 3rd party but i am having problems running it, gonna try to update it or so (edit: after update it's working).
- Sometimes when changing from dvb-s to dvb-s2 and vice-versa cog still appears, and we have to hard restart. It's random, sometimes i zap like 20 times and it's ok, other times i zap 3 times and cog appears and i have to hard reset.
This seems to be the only bug keeping me to go back to original firmware :( now that image quality is superb, it's a shame i have to go back.
whoooo THANKS TO THE TEAM.
Installed successfully over 1.0.1, remote control looks to be fixed, HDMI signal problems looks to be solved.
I setup video at 1080p50 in /etc/init.d/bootup, but image quality is worst than before..... specially in HD channels. It looks upscaled everytime, and titles at the end of the movies scrolling vertically are very bad to see.
System clock is still too fast.
Load average watching HD channel is close to 3.20 using only CCcam 2.1.4.
Congratulations to the team lots of big steps are done... but still somethig to improve and fix...
About the video quality in the early versions video was much better.
Regards.
*ps box is premium
ilcalmo u can't be serious :S
are u sure u have 1.0.2 ? It's impossible what u just said (i'm not trying to be rude i am sorry)
Image quality in tv mode and watching some .xvid seems like deinterlacer in xbox1 (xbmc) and in some HTPC using ati card, using motion/vector adaptive option in catalyst.
Try to format everything and upload again latest image because it's really that good.
Amazingly smooth, no more HD problems and no more "stair effect" or shaked logo/images.
You mean a "Motion Adaptative" algorithm is now implemented for SD and HD signals ? :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeySa
and mediaplayer. 700mb XVID seems like a dvd5 now :)Quote:
Originally Posted by swiffer
@hfmls & ilcalmo
How on earth could we have sooooo different opinions about the video quality? Do you guys have different types of receivers?
well i have azbox hd elite, and i went from original 5020 to today's release, all formatted and "clean". Dunno if that's the reason. I got amazing results.
Just the info.....
- the picture of SD channel is really improved !! Just awesome.......
- the picture of HD channel is worser than previous firmware. As my hd channels are from DVB-S Mpeg2, both jerk and jitter are still exist. But there is a new problem that I think involving MotionAdaptative deinterlace.
- media center is working now but the stability seems to be the same. Many movies can't be watched. Watching movie for a couple of minutes, I got the lip sync problem.
- Cog(Wheel of death) appears from time to time and have to reboot to solve this problem.
Many thanks to the Team........
I am going to install it again.... I will let you know...Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
For now I can confirm that for SD channels video quality is good, but for HD channels is poor... have roping effect also on AXN HD logo. The top line of the logo changes dimension and looks to disappear.... Give it a try....
Regards.
I'm gonna make a video showing u guys the amazing improvement.
All my SD and HD channels are equally perfect. I don't understand why i am so lucky, lol :)
No more stutter or pixelization.
I use Hispasat 30w.
Azbox HD Elite.
BTW: Some friends of mine after replacing dvb-s2 to a more recent one (azbox hd) "fixed" the pixelization and stutter problem.. Could be also hardware problem guys :|
Hard to understand hardware problem, with old verion almost nice, now bad?Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
All that changed is the software.... Something changed from the 1.0.1.
My box is premium on 13E
Regards.
Well I confirm what hfmls reports about picture qual.
In 1.01 I thought SD was realy poor against 0.9.5020, in 1.02 it's much better.
HD is better then 0.9.5020 just take a look @ Sly HD channels and compare
Will test AXN HD today and see
Witch button i press to see subtitles in movies?
Thx
Press AUXQuote:
Originally Posted by paulobr
dear all
the argument going on about the picture quality that i've been asking for a while seems
to be that most who say they have a good picture have elite models and all with the prenium have a bad picture so there must be a driver compatible with one more than another .just my opinion as i still have a bad one .
Yes i know but the subtitles don't appear the subtitles name must be equal to movie like movie name.srt...I press AUX but nothing appear?Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
Copying E2 kernel lasted for over 4 min...
Is that suposed to be so?
I have a prenium and the picthure is very good . it's not a plus ! . maybe it's plus box that not that so good
Nope I tested the plus version
has everyone tested to use the cardreader with cccam?
i tested with oscam, no luck:
2010/12/01 11:21:00 2AAC8B60 s creating thread for device /dev/sc0 slot 0
2010/12/01 11:21:00 2AAC8B60 s waiting for local card init
2010/12/01 11:21:00 2B53D4B0 h HTTP Server listening on port 8383
2010/12/01 11:21:00 2BD3D4B0 r reader thread started (thread=2BD3D4B0, label=zon, device=/dev/sc0, detect=cd, mhz=357, cardmhz=357)
2010/12/01 11:21:00 2BD3D4B0 r Error getting status of terminal.
2010/12/01 11:21:00 2BD3D4B0 r Error getting status of terminal.
2010/12/01 11:21:01 2BD3D4B0 r Error getting status of terminal.
2010/12/01 11:21:01 2BD3D4B0 r Error getting status of terminal.
2010/12/01 11:21:01 2BD3D4B0 r Error getting status of terminal.
2010/12/01 11:21:01 2BD3D4B0 r Error getting status of terminal.
2010/12/01 11:21:01 2BD3D4B0 r Error getting status of terminal.
Hi @hfmls
You can try Newcs?
At least we have a more cardreader confirmation ... than oscam!
Thanks
My impressions so far:
- multimedia - i tried to play 4 avi files and only one run ok, other had problems (wont open, video to slow but audio ok, stops playing after a minute...), i don't see any improvement on this...
- picture quality - SD quality is good, HD quality is CATASTROPHAL (looks worse than SD, im just watching a football game and the lines on the pitch aren't stright, they go zig-zag... lol)
- stability - i got few times these gears and had to restart the reciever (especially in media player when trying to exit)
- other - clock still goes to fast
For me, this is worse than 1.0.1 beta...
Edit: When i try to change HDMI resolution, just like in this tutorial, my AZbox Elite wont start at all and i have to reinstall.
(Tried to change to 1080p50 and 1080i50. Did all correct, checked the premissions and all...)
Please state wich channel on wich satelite to shout it this way is totaly useless other people can't test your findingsQuote:
HD quality is CATASTROPHAL
I tested Sly UK HD movie (28,2E) and Sly Germany HD movie channels (19,2E)they where fine. In fact Sly UK HD movie is better then with 0.9.5020
Sly IT (13E) is bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Carp95
Anixe HD on 23.5E bad,
Astra HD on 23.5E bad,
Astra3D demo ON 23.5E bad
Einsfestival HD 19.0E OK,
Dar Erste HD on 19.0E OK.
You probably have pointing problem on your LNBs : 19°2 OK, all others bad ....
To all people who have bad quality on the channels (especially if you get pixelizations) have you actually done a satellite search to get the channels or have you used a downloaded channel list?
A channel list won't do unless it's made by yourself (using your receiver) since every single tuner&lnb combination differs in frequency. If you're lucky it might work to download fixed channel list but don't count on it.
Hmmm... sounds like 720p ok and 1080i not ok. I'll compare it in the evening on my P+Quote:
Originally Posted by ilcalmo
What's your resolution on Azbox? For my TV I've best results with 1080p60
Edit the file using a Unix text editor like editpad.Quote:
Originally Posted by T0rca1950
Or do it in a telnet session:Quote:
Originally Posted by leerock
mcedit /etc/init.d/bootup (mcedit is an simple to use editor)
Sly IT.Quote:
Originally Posted by Carp95
I used TextMate on my Mac.Quote:
Originally Posted by leerock