Printable View
You have premium I guess. I don't have any problems like that, to be honest, this is the best image so far regarding picture quality and stability (at least on my Elite model).Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
One more bug report (don't know if someone reporeted it already), when in standby for a longer time (few hours) reciver doesn't want to wake up, only restart helps then. And one more thing, clock goes slower than it should when in standby.
[QUOTE=T0rca1950;770110]You have premium I guess. I don't have any problems like that, to be honest, this is the best image so far regarding picture quality and stability (at least on my Elite model).
is the best image so far regarding picture quality so far of what ??/
i read a lot of posts that the picture is superb . don't know how they measure
the picture quality bu to tell you i am not a coder just a humble painter and surly know about picture quality
the best picture for azbox was firmware 3877 and all the images after that
had a poorer quality some worse than others but as i said I'm not a coder so
maybe a hardware problem the more you make options in the firmware
the more the picture gets bad.
in my dm 800 some images have a better pictures than others
but to go back to my prem azbox .the e2 last firmware has the worst picture quality.
I cannot confirm that. On HD-Channels the picture quality is IMHO comparable with my dreambox 800 HD. I've set up my Azbox Premium+ to 1080p60. My Dreambox is set to 1080i60. Because of interlacing Dreambox picture is a little bit flickering at small structures - Azbox picture doesn't!Quote:
Originally Posted by the illuminati
But I think comparing the picture quality is hard because the impression is subjective.
I comparing between dm8000 and p+ on same tv ,same program and for me the az_box wins in picture quality ,also with org 5020 firmware :respect-057:Quote:
Originally Posted by richy18
The latest e2 is working ok for me also on 23.5hd canaldigital i have no problems.
I can use the box now for daily use :respect-046: :respect-046: :bravo-009:
Most LCD/Plasma TV's in the mid to high price range have an upscaler/deintelacer far better than the one in the AzBox. The optimal would be to run the autoresolution plugin for E2.Quote:
Originally Posted by richy18
Haven't checked if it works, but I doubt it.
Dont forget that Opensat helping The ripper & his team is a good thing because they have access to Sigma for drivers and microcode etc.It would be a good idea if they sent the ripper sources from official firmware so he could take the best bits out and use them for E2(just an idea)Quote:
Originally Posted by bevste
the more the better :respect-051:
@kebien and tx0
I really see a lot of sarcasm from both of You guys...
I am sorry why i will dissapoint the tx0, but we have all what we need. All drivers as You can see are finished, just the pending part is fixing the bugs in them :).
Also, to make You more angry, we fixed also Interlacing last night.... wifi for Premium/Premium+, Multimedia fix.....
Recording and subtitle support is on the way....
And to open you a what ? hehehe
Yes, enigma 2 is open, visit opendreambox.org , download Makefile-Opendreambox-1.6 and enjoy :) . Drivers You can find in every release of RTi Core Image :).
And for sure You would not be a one who would develope for AzBox, as that are not Your intentions, Your goal is to disturb and giving a rumors.
You are trying to put pressure on us, or to tell people that this project will fail, very mean from You ;) , but dont worry, we are here, and those users dont need Your opinnion.
I think that we should ask moderation of this forum to limit You access to this section, because You are constantly trying to provoke us without any reason :)
So now enjoy, and would be happy to see after new release(s) how the people will spit on You :)
@MickeySAQuote:
Originally Posted by MickeySa
Don't worry. Most users (me too) really enjoy your work!!! IMHO it's absolute great and I'm really thankful for it!! So, keep up your good work!!! We love it :respect-023:
Btw. you said "all drivers are finished". Can you please publish the DVB-C driver (binary). I know, it's not ready and you focused your energy on cleaning DVB-S driver but you can give people with Twin-tuner (or DVB-C tuner only) a chance to test it and to report bugs.
For me this would be a pleasure and a honor!
Best regards
Richy
@MickeySa c'mon mate Im happy you have success. I can say that I'm not from China or some other opensat rivals and Its true. Im just another azbox user that wants to get the things more faster. I like people that keep their word and do what they are promised. Someone promised us a cvs server. Opensat never keep their word. Ditto opensat s**t.
http://lh3.ggpht.com/_87UCIJEjSgY/TO...Untitled-2.jpg
http://lh3.ggpht.com/_87UCIJEjSgY/TO...Untitled-1.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeySa
Thanks, I think this is a very well phrased response, supported by facts.
:)Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeySa
@ MickeySaQuote:
Originally Posted by MickeySa
Please can the team make public the release with the media player work i need that so much could be today please.
Thanks for the hard work that you have done
For Your information !!!Quote:
Originally Posted by tx0
Admin of website removed that to put link for Bug tracker !!!
Also for Your information :
http://svn.azbox-enigma.eu/engima2
You was not able to search little bit arround to get this infos.... come one... you are here with just one purpose....
A troll, beware!Quote:
Originally Posted by tx0
What is closed and you need to open ?Quote:
Originally Posted by tx0
ALL about E2 is open and public , only ... you must use google ;)
OK, if you think that using google is closed project , pls tell to as , what you need to open ?
Of course , only driver is with licence, but this is pointlessly in this story.
Pls read all post about E2 for AZBox and you will found all what you need, and pls , before post anything next - read old post about E2
rgs,
great. how do I enter this site? It says 'Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeySa
Error - Invalid username or password'
and there is no registration panel
Please Tx0, the majority here doesn't need your wellthought postings. Please go to your room and don't come for a few months. MickeySA said enough to show you really don't know what you are talking about. Save yourself (and your friends) more humiliations.
Ripper and co; keep up the good work!
JeezQuote:
Originally Posted by tx0
don t you ever stop man?
It would be great if I or some other guys that want to be involved can compile latest working fw image themselves. So all what have been done till now - I mean patches for open sourced e2, kernel drivers, and even some other sources like card reader microcode should be published.Quote:
Originally Posted by @telesat
The best fw images are always came from independent sources.
IMHO we should stop talking about single opinions (like tx0s). He has the right to publish (freedom of opinion) but this endless discussion about it is simply counterproductive.
I think most of Azbox Users are very happy about rippers and co work and it's not our job to defend this work or to protect rippers honor!
Our job is simply testing and finding bugs for bugtracker. So let us concentrate on the essentials instead of loosing energy in writing endless reviews about a single (in some eyes destructive) opinion.
I have published detailed bugreports and I used bugtracker too. What about YOU???
Best regards
Richy
The zapping of D + to D + HD crashes ALWAYS
The zapping DVBS to DVBS2 crashes 90% of times
Only audio, no video. And within five seconds, locks.
Any solution?
No sarcasm from me,I just proposed the validity of a situation,not wishing it to happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeySa
I am so optimistic that I do not even post bugs knowing others will be more interested in doing that.
No pressure from me to you guys.
But I am realistic also,there are things that might stop the development,or you are going to tell me this didn't happen to Opensat ???
Because it is clear they had/have no clue how to make the thing work as it should.
Kudos to you guys and keep it up.
if I go I see the info CrossEPG creation time how big the file,
channel number 296
33901 events
13018 keys
but I still do not see anything about multi epg chart.
could be the problem are the settings? use those of Hannibal.
decoder elite firmware RTi core 1.0.1 BETA
hello
Guys, if you want to publish a problem/bug, please include at least your model and firmware version so developers can work with your information. In case of zapping problem provider and cam could help too. Just a note, no flame pls...Quote:
Originally Posted by AAOM
For all...
The best is tu use Bug tracking website, so You can select in Operatin system Your model, and ofcourse, there is version 1.0.1 ....
Sorry.Quote:
Originally Posted by AAOM
Azbod Hd Elite with firmware RTi core 1.0.1 beta.
I test with last firmware of DSteam with identical problem.
I test with CCcam 2.1.3, 2.2.0 and 2.2.1.
I test with multiple chanels list -Daconi, sofrenic and others-
I changed video config to DVI, components, ... and i test with 1080i or 720p==> same problem.
Sorry for my english
Regards.
Here on P+ no problem with d+ channels (cccamQuote:
Originally Posted by AAOM
2.2.1)
MickeySA that is huge news, from what i understand "interlace fix" will fix fast movements and also improve hugely image quality right?Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeySa
it should behave like autoresolution plugin? Since that plugin improves quality by a mile.
We would appreciate if you had the time to tell us the improvements in interlace fix :)
Can't wait for next update/release :)
Will this be released by modules in software update, or new team image?
The_Ripper
MickeySA
I am having problems installing project-valerie in latest releases. in DSteam image based on yours 3.0.1 it works. But not in original 3.0.1
After moicas help and tests and some talk to project-valerie guys they said this:
You are missing the *******Summary class which is part of e2 since forever.
http://git.opendreambox.org/?p=enigm...perimental#l18
File "/usr/lib/enigma2/python/Plugins/Extensions/ProjectValerie/DMC_******.py", line 1, in <module>
from Screens.****** import ******Summary
ImportError: cannot import name ******Summary
----------------------------------------------------------
Could u guys fix/support this again please?
Or could u guys tell me a quickfix to solve this please?
Thank you.
EDIT: after some try this and that, here is the fix:
http://www.4shared.com/file/MztqTPZu/******.html
upload those files to:
/usr/lib/enigma2/python/Screens/
Project Valerie working! :)
Hello,
please forgive me, all of you, if this question has been answered before, but I have tried and searched and have not found an answer.
I would like to take part in trying and testing e2 image. But as long as the multimedia part is not fully working, I need to go back to original FW ever so often. I am running KGD 4890 on my AZPremium for some time now. I would not like to lose the EPG for instance, and I have installed the ipkg system and some more.
My question now: when, after testing, I go back to KGD4890, is the internal HD untouched, or are there links etc. rewritten for getting e2 running? In short: does the go-back-process mean reinstalling the original KGD4890 and rebuilding my current state or can I start re-using it right away?
Mike
will sattomy include this in E2 as standard media package??Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
noQuote:
Originally Posted by kooleracer
Hi Mike,Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyea
you have to differ "internal HD" and "DOM". The DOM (this 256MB Flash-Memory) will be erased if you install enigma2 on it. In this case your KGD on DOM is lost. But with AzUp 1.2.5 you can install enigma2 on a memory stick. In that case your KGD on DOM will be left untouched and only the kernel in internal flash will be changed. Your HD (your HardDisk) will be untouched in both cases.
IMHO the best way for you is installing E2 on a memory stick. So you have to replace the kernel only (with AzUp) if you want to change between KGD and E2.
Enjoy testing :)
Thanks Richy for your explanation. I guess I will try the memory stick option then. But i assume perfomance will be rather bad when running from USB stick or has USB port throughput improved under e2?
Mike
Your links are not working, pls fix them.Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeySa
What was the point of creating a Bug Tracker on azbox-enigma.eu if the post gets deleted?
I reported a "Feature Request" for DVB-T support. and marked it with "medium priority"
I read through the other post before I reported it, and none had reported it yet.
The report Id was "ID28"
I understand if it was deleted because several asked for the same thing, but I can not see that anyone have asked for this.
If it was deleted because it was fixed then the "Progress bar" should have been updated to 100% and not deleted.
For me this is not a big deal, but I'd like to know why.
Can anyone help me understand why it was deleted?
Bug Tracker is only for reported bugs.
Not to make requests.
DVB-T, DVB-C, Recording, Internal Reader, etc... are not bugs.
Normal everything bugs than delete it.
I think it is better to close this thread,as far as it adds no value to the development,it is best to Using bug tracking web site so as mickeySa has said. To create a peace again,Some things have all been answered, it still makes no sense to repeat things. if something changes, this is also clearly stated in the change log. such as DVB-T or DVB-C is known to all. and these are not bugs they simply are not added. this is my opinion.:victory-045:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoRpHiUS_x
ok, I have no problems understanding that, but then the "Feature Request" button should have been removed.
The way I understood it was also possible to ask for a Feature Request by using the ""Feature Request" button.
I think you understand why it is a bit confusing.
What should the "Feature Request" be used for then?
Should I use it to Request a Feature bug? :chinese-bow-005:
Edit:
Great that the team have made the Bug list, keep up the good work :-) I hope that we also can use this to make requests In the future.
It's a very straightforward and easy way to do it :-)
I agree with you on this. A svn is necessary, not only to be able to create images, but also to help the developers, by fixing bugs, implementing new things...Quote:
Originally Posted by tx0