Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by tx0
Quite disrespectful in my opinion, but hey, it's a free world, right?
In my opinion these guys have realized huge improvements since the first proof of concept. For example, the improvement on the drivers is very impressive.
Stability is improving step-by-step.
But again, who am I to criticize your opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
Well I think you know that better. Just check your private
messages to me before e2 was released.
What are the benefits of the DS image over the original?Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
Sattommy said earlier that there will be a new release shortly with mediaplayer fixed.
I dont know weather to wait for the fixed beta
Yeah, so ? Everybody knows by no the situation.
That doesn't have nothing to do with the fact that you come here 99% sure without testing latest release and starting saying that only FTA working and it's for hackers and they now release stuff like fan off/on?
Do u ever read changelogs?
STC timmer was added!
VDF support added!
EPG support plugin added!
now they are working on recording and internal card reader...
Now if that's small peas for you.......well...i dunno what to say.
No,Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
You are the one that doesn't know what he s talking about...
If you read my post carefully you ll know what I meant with the word easy...
It's not that anyone could do this ( in fact I think that the ripper is the only one that could succeed on this)
All I meant by the word easy is ( a less time spending procedure)
Fixing bugs is a lot more time spending procedure and any developer can tell you this...
don't use DSteam image! Some bugs and after reboot stops booting forever :)Quote:
Originally Posted by stevie1961
Yes you're right. That's not harder or easier, it takes more time :)Quote:
Originally Posted by leerock
Either way i think we all agree this first BETA is pretty damn usable and stable, for exception of tx0.
And step by step The_Ripper would kill bugs.
No, it's not stable at all. You're running one satellite, I'm running 16 with one uncommitted and four committed switches.Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
I get the lockup/freezing with the gears running the whole time when zapping.
Don't take me wrong here, I know this is only a beta and I think these guys have done a lot in a short period of time.
But stop assuming what the rest of us agree with
Ok i apologize for that, i only use hispasat and it works perfect.
It's not working for me as well. I keep getting this green screen when booting after install.
Just to be clear, I'm not criticizing, it's still a beta version.
Guys, everytime you reply to someone's post dissing the work that Ripper and team are doing, you are increasing their fun of winding you all up.
If you don't reply they won't have the ammunition, and maybe, just maybe, this thread might stay a little smaller.
hfmls
Of course it does work for you,the main problem is you keep on talking on behalf of developers and all users (IT DOES COME OUT THAT WAY),and they have their own mouth and hands to defend themselves if they need to.
We already know about your enthusiasm and was discussed before in this same thread.
You must understand the logic behind tx0 reference is that just MIGHT be a point where development can get stuck because (and this is only one situation) microcode for certain features from sigma might not be available,or is badly designed or written to be able to build and efficient driver or implement a function.
It is a very valid point,in my view,regardless is written in sour words.
You must also try to understand the concept : sigma might not have designed the perfect SOC,this mean you will never have a perfect box.
You must stop jumping on everyone that decide to post negative remarks or suspicions when can be well founded.
You have no arguments more than what you read here,other people might know a lot more about the subject than yourself.
Most people with little knowledge think this is easy,and you know better,let them cry if they want to.
Try installing with another USB stick. One more thing is that you safely remove the stick after you've copied the patch file to your stick (right klick on the icon in your task bar). Don't just rip it out after you're finished.Quote:
Originally Posted by MoGaZz
If you're running XP, be sure that the "removable media" icon in the taskbar is gone before you take the stick out. XP doesn't inform the user when it's safe to remove, Vista and Win 7 do.
I had the same phenomenom, another stick made it for me.
For All GUYS getting green screen when booting after install....Quote:
Originally Posted by MoGaZz
THE REASON is that your box must stay connected to internet or your router to make this green screen disapear.... it seems that a "background scanning of TPs" is running in background of fw while booting.
dvlajkovic did already mentioned it in a previous post.:sifone:
Background scanning of transponders has nothing to do with the internet. The background scanning only affects the transponder you're using when you look at a channel.Quote:
Originally Posted by halabessa
HiQuote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
HD channels working with our bad pixels? How to?
for people that having problem with the BETA version, just stop using e2 beta and wait when the release candidate or version 1.0 comes out. Because every update there are people nagging about can't install or E2 is not booting if you can't fix your problems by yourself or don't know what FTP telnet or DHCP is you are not ready to use a beta. Many of your problems aren't BETA errors but your errors !!!!
And for people who don't appreciate the work of ripper don't comment anymore just keep it to yourself and use AZbox FW dont bother us with your silly comments on this forum!!!
AND YES DVB-T AND DVB-C ARENT SUPPORTED RIGHT NOW STOP ASKING ABOUT IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN!!!!!
ONTOPIC:great job the fixes are really working when E2 is finished to AZbox will be a real mediacenter!
Yes and ity doesn't work with official DMM images on all DMM models.Quote:
Originally Posted by leerock
You guys have lost the whole point off this image.
Tested DS 3.01A on my Premium:
Tested:
19,2 east canal digitaal NL ---> SD 100%
19,2 east Sky Germany ----> SD 100% - HD 99% - German sound OK when selecting english audio track No sound everywhere needs reboot
28,2 east Sky UK --------> SD 100% - HD 100%
13 east - Sky IT ---------> SD 100% - HD 99% - changing audio track results in No sound everywhere needs reboot
13 east - Cyfra+ ----------> SD 100% - HD 99%- changing audio track results in No sound everywhere needs reboot
23,5 east - canal digitaal NL--> SD 100% - HD no sound change back to SD no sound needs reboot
All with CCcam 2.14 from addonserver.
Lots off spinners coming up don't know why; background scanning? loading epg?
So for me there has to be a audio fix and the spinners can get realy frustrating
So far a very good job, keep it up guys
Ok, maybe you are right.... but for me I had the same problem then when I connect the box to internet & make a reboot.... the green page disapear.Quote:
Originally Posted by GOG
The announced bugtracker is now online:
http://www.azbox-enigma.eu/bugtrac/
So, report your bugs please. The more you report the faster the development will be :302:
This is a problem with sound when you select another track than 1st one :Quote:
Originally Posted by Carp95
1 west : Canal digital nordic - no sound when changed between audio chnls .
Cheers ,
Val .
@GOG
I’ll try with another USB stick, but I honestly don’t think that’s the problems, since I've always removed my usb sticks correctly.
@halabessa and @GOG
So the problem should be an internet connection or a working satellite connection(TP scan)? Because I have none right now! I just moved into a new house hehehe…
@kooleracer
I disagree with you. There’s a big difference between giving feedback or just complain about something.
Can anyone share this file i don't know change the file please.Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
Thanks,
Guys, remember to use the bug tracker to input the bug's. This will help the team to solve them quick and also to now what to do.
PS: Before reporting a bug, first read if your bug isn't already reported.
Also, that is not a forum, so limit your self to to bug report, not to chat.
http://www.azbox-enigma.eu/bugtrac/
whats the easiest way to convert azbox dvbs.dat file to satellite.xml so you can keep current sat/transponder data for use with E2?
Telesat's AZBoxedit could go from satellite.xml -> dvbs.dat which was great for factory firmware but now need to go in reverse :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls View Post
i did this to setup CrossEPG:
Enigma2 installation (dreambox)
with a unix compatible editor edit the file /usr/bin/enigma2.sh and before the line
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libopen.so.0.0 /usr/bin/enigma2
add this line
/usr/crossepg/crossepg_epgmove.sh
After reboot i went to download manually, then i reboot again, and EPG fully working.
Now only clock gets crazy
take the fileQuote:
Originally Posted by paulobr
For people can't see their usb drive
Type this command in telnet for see your hardrive sda
sfdisk /dev/sda -l
Then go to ftp /etc/Code:root@AZBox:~# sfdisk /dev/sda -l
Disk /dev/sda: 60801 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track
Units = cylinders of 8225280 bytes, blocks of 1024 bytes, counting from 0
Device Boot Start End #cyls #blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 0+ 60800 60801- 488384032 c W95 FAT32 (LBA)
/dev/sda2 0 - 0 0 0 Empty
/dev/sda3 0 - 0 0 0 Empty
/dev/sda4 0 - 0 0 0 Empty
Edit fstab file and you will see something like that:
Code:rootfs / auto defaults 1 1
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
devpts /dev/pts auto mode=0620,gid=5 0 0
usbfs /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults 0 0
tmpfs /var tmpfs defaults 0 0
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults 0 0
/dev/hda2 /boot auto rw 0 0
/dev/hda3 swap swap defaults 0 0
/dev/hda5 /media/cf auto defaults 0 0
/dev/hdb1 /media/hdd auto defaults 0 0
/dev/sda1 /media/usb auto defaults 0 0]
Then change in /media/usb your sda device /dev/sda1 or sda2 sda3 sda4
Cheers for the file, dont know what I was doing wrong but have now got it working! Only wants to work with XMLTV files not opentv! So far Sky uk and Sky Italia loaded with some gaps on Italia, gonna try some more later. Cooltv guide looks cool!:)Quote:
Originally Posted by antonis13
@ebro
I'm not dissing anyone here. What I'm trying to tell is
while trying to fix 'fan off in standby' important bug there are some other basic major issues that weren't even mentioned on that bugtrack site. everyone know what are they. Ok. Its easy to say, Who am I and who is the_Ripper that doesn't owe me anything. I don't owe anyone here as well, k?
Now lets skip all these emotional remarks from hfmls and others and be unbiased. Just a theory - It could be very convenient for opensat to hire some guys that do some development, to get rid of their responsibilities for fw while keeping the sales up. If all this azbox-e2 stuff is just enthusiastic fun why don't you open the code for other people to get involved?
please skip all that 'you don't respect bla bla' comments for God sake you'll be wrong
Obviously, it has been confirmed this team is supported by OpenSat. See releasenotes of last firmware version.Quote:
Originally Posted by tx0
Without this, it would probably be pretty much impossible to rewrite the drivers. This is also one of the reasons why these driver will remain proprietary.
The bugtrac system was opened today, and is only partially filled with the current bug reports so far. The current status of the firmware is still quite premature in my opinion, but a huge step forward since the first proof of concept.
I think for most users here, including me, I could say "Hope dies last". Obviously you have no confidence in this, which is absolutely fine. Either be satisfied with the current capabilities of your azbox, wait for improvement of these capabilities or sell your box and take your loss.
This thread is intended primarily for those who have faith in development of a functional E2 firmware for their azbox and I see no reason why you should barge in here to spoil this for anyone with your comments.
As I mentioned before, it's a free world, but there are probably places to find with souls more alike than in this thread.
In RTi core Beta 1.0.0 ripper thanked opensat, does anyone know what opensat give the ripper?
In what way is opensat involved in rippers work since RTi core 1.0.0?
I really think that is none of our business.Quote:
Originally Posted by kooleracer
Please, dont answer my question with your crap !Quote:
Originally Posted by T0rca1950
If you don't want to know just don't say anything....
Why is this forum getting polluted with people like YOU :banghead:
What is your problem mate ? As far as I know all of this is for free/hobby. What will be the problem if the ripper & co get something payed for it ? At the end they are doing the job, I don't have to pay so.... I try and give my contribution by reporting bugs I notice important or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by tx0
Maybe its just me but I dont give a **** what level of involvement Opensat have in this project, as I said before they have been remiss in their responcibilitys but what MOST people want in this thread is a decent firmware for this box! The Ripper & co are getting there bit by bit! There is some way to go but with a bit more time it is gonna be way better than official firmware! I would suggest people who are not likeminded should go irritate another forum!!
Hehe, you are talikng crap, not me.Quote:
Originally Posted by kooleracer
Why should you know that? Is that something that will help you with some work so that you can contribute to this project? Or is it just a dumb question to satisfy your curiousity?
So, please tell me, why is that important right now?
Calm, calm, calm, calm calm.... Do not rise.......
wow, surprised by some of the feedback here. While lots of interesting speculation can be made with cease of factory firmware releases with simultaneous rapid dev of E2, why does anyone care whether opensat is intimately involved or just passively assisting? would anyone prefer the alternative and the factory firmware updates which advanced the platform very little? As AZBox owners, we have an opportunity to have software which can utilize the strength of the hardware and that is what should matter most. I'm personally thankful to the_ripper and team and to Opensat for whatever assistance they are providing.
hd channels work ok, nod bad pixels, BUT i have a problem watching football or ice hokey (or many movement).Quote:
Originally Posted by peterpau
It behaves like an old PC running 1080p movies. It kind of stutters if u know what i mean.
I assume that 3000 post in one thread shows that there are very many dedicated people who are happy about the job being done to our AZBox right now :woot-035:
Good idea to start the Bug Tracker on azbox-enigma.eu