Printable View
Agreed, why do people keep askign for this thread to be closed? There is 100k hits on this, obviously many people are interested in following the topic. Read or dont read, contribute or dont contribute - its your choice but there is no reason to close a thread of interest to so many people.Quote:
Originally Posted by chrissat
Completely agree with you m8Quote:
Originally Posted by aspava
we didn t get the fw on the promised date so we should at least get an excuse of why it didnt happen..
Or a youtube video showing an az running that fw..
That would ease the wait and make it more valueable...
They make us waiting for sth that maybe do not even excist...
It all feels like a fairy tale that all of us believe
and that makes us look like fools..
If external developers have the same attitude on users as the internal(opensat) developers then
the azbox needs a very low profile consumers...
Agree with you, but it doesn't mean that the man who compiled a native CCcam does not deserve more time to improve better way to compile E2.Quote:
Originally Posted by tx0
Well, that's promissing if they contribute.Quote:
Originally Posted by tx0
Concerning raskino, may be you are right concerning this forum, but have a look on other italian forums (hxxp://www.azboxhd.it &Quote:
Originally Posted by tx0
hxxp://www.azboxhd.altervista.org), then you will know much more about him.
If there is no e2 team and no e2 developers (may be you are right, even if there is many azdevelopers).Quote:
Originally Posted by tx0
But no e2: I don't agree with you. If so, why are all these people confirming that, and why didn't opensat deny officialy that there will be no e2? aren't they concerned?
So let's wait & by all means if we will not have a bugs free e2, i belive this thread will give a real push to a relative stable fw (wether totaly based on e2, or a developed hybrid one).
cheers:respect-066:
ok i agreeQuote:
Originally Posted by halabessa
but is not corect give the date if you not sure 100%
When E2 was first made to work on a Kathrein a very buggy version that could only be loaded from a linux server was released.
This was nowhere near a usable version, that took much longer, many more weeks, but it showed "proof of concept"
It would stop the arguments if something like this could be released for the azbox.
I totaly agree with you for the date, those who mentioned it must explain at least why it isn't sorted out yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by ilje
@ raskino
would you please tell us why the date of 28 March no news?:001_07:
Quote:
Originally Posted by halabessa
I read this thread with amazement & Wonderment !!!!
Why must anyone explain anything to you or anyone else !!!!
if it comes it comes, these Guyz are not getting paid to do this by Us !!
they as far as we know are doing it because they are Hobbyists like us, So have some Manners, & Patience, and it may be released if it exists, I dont particuarly care as I have a DM 800, But its the same old typical attitude, " We want it !! We are entitled to it !!! You are of opensat as the box is Buggy as hell !!!
But If E2 comes, Be Thankful !!!!!! :smash:
Al
@kanber_kav
As I know I and my friend is programer, but others is helping with the tests.
@tx0
Regarding DFB on Sigma 8634, it's not just simple DFB library, it has full audio/video/demux implementation for Sigma chip, it's not some software emulation.
Post by Netgic (Administrator) on m*azbox.de, and translated by google
Quote:
It was not at the mention of the firmware appears on Sunday.
Where did I write that?
People that you have read in some other forums and habts once believed.
That is what is the reason why we should not give any exact dates.
Since then waits for all the world and is disappointed when it finally does not appear.
I want to stress again that the firmware itself is not of OPENSAT.
This is an alternative firmware that is developed independently from the original firmware.
The development of course Impex-Sat or anyone else will be encouraged, I can unfortunately not there to conceal themselves Gigacam has indeed confirmed in a thread.
....
@kanber_kav
Hmmm, I will see about this things, I hate that someone is using me in this way.
WTF Opentivix, hmmm.
Thx for clarification.
......
kanber üstad gerçekten sizceazbox e2 böye bir ihtimal varmı yoksa uydurmamı sizin gözlemleriniz bizim için çok önemli üstad sizi http://www.turkeyforum.com/satforum/...play.php?f=390 görmek isteriz.Quote:
Originally Posted by kanber_kav
Do you really think the Master Kanber Boye probably my fitting your observations or very important to us, you Master :dupe:
If any one here is from impex-sat wtf with this team names.
I am working on alternative and my friend.
This is getting more interesting that I imagine ....
Maybe you should look at your pms ;)
very sorry.
@colla
Check PM
If you have not dreamed of an enigma work you publish or display picture, everybody believed the lies
LOL. I ve read FAQ:Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Ripper
DirectFB is a thin library that provides hardware graphics acceleration, input device handling and abstraction, integrated windowing system with support for translucent windows and multiple display layers, not only on top of the Linux Framebuffer Device. It is a complete hardware abstraction layer with software fallbacks for every graphics operation that is not supported by the underlying hardware. DirectFB adds graphical power to embedded systems and sets a new standard for graphics under Linux.PHP Code:hxxp://directfb.org/
Will you read your PM someday? :reddevil:
This thread is getting more popular everyday. Soon it'll beat google on its popularity :podium-016:
We have to sell some space for ads here and hire Sigma professionals for e2 team. :D
turkeyforum kendi bilmez modlardan oluşuyor.Quote:
Originally Posted by ms2003
Zamanında çok emek verdi turkeyforumda (gbox_paylasim ve kanber_kav niçki ile) ama forumdan banladılar. O yüzden o forumda yazmam bidaha.
E2 ye gelince inş. olur diyorum. ama inancım kalmadı.
Turkish'm sorry.