Printable View
i don,t beleve that azbox is going to run enigma2.
because azbox can only run signed sigma firmware code.
as we know sigma, did not relased the source code to run others than celrun.
i know there is some modchip for sigma processor but if this is going to work also on enigma2 ? i don,t know.
we shall see.
:respect-050:
The "modchips" are for early revisions and I think modchiping it will give no advantage (maybe BluRay/DVD at it's most), the problem that have been has been microcode for the hardware layer (making the CPU work less). If microcode has been given from Sigma or other sources then DVB-API should be possible (without microcode it still is possible but real slow). My two cents...Quote:
Originally Posted by alcomys
Opensat is no legal owner of anything, they are not even developing any software or hardware.
Opensat can do ****, that is a fact. They have been bought some month ago by a German company so they don't even own their own name.
Enigma 1,2 or 3 ;) all depend on driver, witch are owned by Sigma. So the Enigma will be crappy because they don't own anything.
Sell your box and don't waste your time on closed source with a deceiving Linux label on it.
can only say 100% right, but they can do a little bit: kill this ****ty OpenXCAS and take DVB Api, so it will help the Soft to be a bit better :)Quote:
Originally Posted by grizzlyt
But I see it here, have two Boxes near by near. When I use my VU+ it is amazing, it makes fun.
When I try to use the near AZHD its like a hell!
lame, gui reaction like a sleeping pill.
I can do this for 5 Minutes, then I must power off this AZ because it makes no fun.
Bevor I havnt recogniced this but now with a really fast and stable Box its different as day and night
How are the media player capabilites for the VU? near azbox? 1080P dts over lan?Quote:
Originally Posted by hanswurscht
I need an STB no Mediaplayer :)
For this I have another working Thing, which plays it all an to any Time.
But anyway, Vu plays my Films also, but this is not the Point for which Ive bought it.
I need a fast STB, with 4 Records at the same Time(all HD, all crypted) and a good and fast Web TV with no freezing all the time
i tested a few 720p movies on vu+ and everything was ok. But vu+ doesnt support subtitles.
I dont know about 1080p, because iam not watching those movies.
But at the end, vu+ is sat receiver with media player ability. Azbox is media player and then sat/dvb-t/c receiver. I prefer 1. option ;)
Regarding the multimedia azbox is far the best receiver No1
O god, now we get round 200. A couple of boys comes here in this thread saying VU+ is the future and the AZbox is no fun. A few answers further we get the DM boys saying their box is better and at the end everybody is mad and we also got this round no winner like all the other times....
For the last time, I like my AZbox , I can't get it stuck, always can watch telly and the only reason i read this thread is because i'm curious if HMFLS is right or not about Enigma. Not to read all that frustrated stories of other receceivers so please stop bash!
look over the plate and see what u are missing :)Quote:
Originally Posted by sofrenic
some people here speak so rough that make me think that they only reason to speak this way is to promote other boxes indirect.I am so sick of this situation .This and other forums turned out a paradise for people whom their only purpose its to promote products and flame other products.
i am also not a 100% satisfied azbox user but i dont speak this way.i am patient as my box continues to work well for everyday use.i would love to see enigma2 development also but only if this dont stop current firmware development.
really guys how much free time do u have daily to watch tv and play with satellite releases? some people her claim that azbox is sh*t as it cannot stream to 6 computers or that it cannot record 8 channels at the same time.thats ridiculous.when u have free time to see all this recorded stuff?
come one people calm.state each receiver positive and negative points without flaming.let people read and make their decision about their ideal receiver.
as for me will continue to use my azbox in combination with my htpc
postiv,negativ like always.Quote:
Originally Posted by mushroom
When you have two Boxes (and I have two Boxes, also AZHD) and I compare them, there are so much Points which will make loose this AZHD, thats all.
Maybe Opensat will wake up but I dont think so.
take a look to the Past, always Firmwares with more bugs, more problems, no really official Firmware, only B A S T E L Firmware.
So what should we say to this?
Great work Opensat?
But Anga Cable, promote new ****, this irgent for them....
dear hans i find posts like yours to be positive by the way that u compare azbox with another receiver and u post your experience.so i find this positive.my post was not targeted at you but to other people who do flame and their only purpose is to flameQuote:
Originally Posted by hanswurscht
i have an azbox and i test also a dm800 for 2-3 weeks and they both do the same job.ok dm800 is faster on cs and interface and u have a lot of stuff to play.but both succeed to their main purpose.to watch tv.
yeap azbox has bugs but i dont think that pressure is always helpful.sometimes pressure brings worst results.i agree opensat must hear our voices otherwise ........
but i am calm and i still didnt lose my hope :)
OK, thanks in Advance.
Im not only flaming(Im never flaming I think because I still have my Box but use it only in a rar time)I tell what I think, and I think its Time for Opensat to do fast anything positiv to the Box.
3-4 Firmware per Week, its also again P A S T !
Better some bad and buggy firmware then nothing like now, so we see, they are working on it.
So we see nothing, only a Box full of Bugs with no help from Producer.
I know its not easy to play with this Firmware, but we all have paid for an STB which should working after 15 Month, but it dont or when it works, it works like a lame Cow with three legs :)
Hi all,
On other forums, found same rumours about E2 on Azbox hd......
@ Samurai wrote:
"It's allmost out, still on test phase, but so far all mipsel are running good...Azbox will be the best rival of Dreambox HD, nothing we wouldn't expect...2 teams will have access to machine source code, Nabilo Team and Opensat Team, and just those two will create images and skins for Azbox HD receivers....hang on...heads up..."
then he added:
"Sources so far are only the ones betatesters know of...NabiloSat Team and Opensat Team, if that's enough for you people!
The tests are entering the final stages, so i wouldn't be surprised if E2 would be released for Azbox HD receivers until the end of February..."
So let's wait & see.:respect-047:
I hope that it comes but Rumours are Rumours and on AZHD ive read so much Rumours, at the End all was not true.
But hope dies last....
Yeah i'd agree with that!Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSkul
Only, option 2 has LAN limitation also!
i have no problems using nfs :)Quote:
Originally Posted by PieFacE
___http://www.nabilosat.info/forum/showthread.php?82412-E2-rumour-again
hmmm nabilosat and opensat both no nothing hmfls u sure this is true ?
no wait , look thisQuote:
Originally Posted by halabessa
NABILO :
WE DON`T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT AZBOX E2 .. OR ANY DEVLOPENEMT
ITS FALSE RUMOUR FROM SOME FORUMS SPAMERS
THEY JUST SPAM THE AZBOX TEAM .. .
YOU CAN BELIVE ON THIS INFO`S ONLY IF YOU HAVE THIS FIRMWARE RUNING ON YOUR BOX
I HAVE AZBOX AND I USE IT WITHOUT e2 AND I M HAPPY WITH IT
*************************
hahahaha will prolly be a fan speed ajustment you get lol
yesQuote:
Originally Posted by SAUS04
I was too thick to set it up hahaha:respect-055:Quote:
Originally Posted by sattommy
HFMLS, do you have any news on it? Maybe if it does or doesn't run stable?Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
not yet, i'm waiting for new feedback. but i was told (same thing as samurai) it will take probably two-three weeks to "appear" to us.
Any idea if opensat will still work on their regular firmware?Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
i dunno,BUT probably 100% sure yes :)
why would they stop?
not all users will use enigma 2 or know what is enigma 2.
current firmware is the official one, i think they will continue.
but, from opensat you never know what da hell they are doing. :\
That figures, seeing they don't have a single clue what they are doing themselves!Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls
OpenSAT already denied enigma2 as being there for Azbox.
You wanna blame somebody, shoot the messenger
This thread really should be closed now, if E2 arrives then fantastic. Until that point the thread should be renamed "Boring Gossip Do NOT Read" and then locked.
Just my opinion.
Opensat cant change there lame OpenXCas to any better one.
Opensat cant speed up the ****ty lame Network.
Opensat cant build a near stable Firmware
But they can build an E2 ?
Im laughing out loud,, sorry
As long as they have not all sources for the complete Hardware in the Box they will build nothing, only unstable java Handyprogrammerfirmware
Now you "blame" OpenSAT again?
OpenSAT didn't anouce Enigma2 NO they denied Enigma2
Nabilo didn't anounce Enigma2 NO denied Enigma2
Only hfmls's "sources" (wich he didn't revail) claimed enigma2 as being tested.
Supposed to be a OpenSAT / Nabilo affort.
Believe me if they where in that stage they would say so, because that would mean "The Ripper" finished dvb-api for Sigma in 3 weeks ( thats impossible )
Please close this topic.
hfmls has of course all sources, as he is the all best knowing Man always :)
See all his Post and you know about veracity of his statements
They've made a very good job doing this so far :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by hanswurscht
i didn't create this thread to flame anyone or any company or team group.
all i can say again and again is that enigma2 in azbox hd is true.
other than that, there's no reason for me to re-post over and over again.
i could post some conversations and logs, but i was ask not to.
just remember a work without pressure is faster/better than a work with pressure. maybe that's why all rumors were denied. my 2 cents.
i'm not the only guy interested in azbox hd and enigma 2. and not the only guy with safe sources. browse a little, and ask around. i have 100% sure u will confirm what i allways said. enigma 2 is a yes.
and YES u wanna blame anyone, blame me, i don't care.
future will serve you right.
yes, they did. also nabilo denied it too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Carp95
but i stand with what i said.
enigma 2 is being tested.
u guys can leave this thread to believers and just ignore it if u want.
aahh boy ,,you keep on and on and on and on ...look m8 ,now it better be true if not you better go from here and never come back..and please admin/mod/owner...etc ....put this tread to an end until those claims are real and existant....million thanx
why won't i keep on? nothing changed since i got my sources.
it would be a bad signal if i never answered. that would mean it was a lie.
the fact it isn't.
The thread shouldn't be closed. There are plenty of people interested to hear how this goes. If some don't like this thread they can simply choose not to read it.Quote:
Originally Posted by pipino
Hfmls is sure of his sources and I'm happy to put my faith in him.
The thread won't be closed.