Enigma 2 by The_ripper - TEST -

ok guys please forgive me im a newbie at this so dont get angry if i ask silly questions,seeing all your posts means that a e2 on the azbox is a good thing so im all for that.So my question is this with this e2 could i get oscam server reading my card or is it too early to tell??as im only new to this box i dont want to stuff it up so would an e2 expert please tell me if its good to upload the e2 into my azboxhd or is it better to hold off a little longer????PS im glad there are guys out there willing to give up their time with fixing the faults with this box.

yes, you will be able to use oscam to read card.

This is not a full working version (FTA tuner test only).
So ... wait until they release a stable & complete version!

:respect-054:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cro1969

ok guys please forgive me im a newbie at this so dont get angry if i ask silly questions,seeing all your posts means that a e2 on the azbox is a good thing so im all for that.So my question is this with this e2 could i get oscam server reading my card or is it too early to tell??as im only new to this box i dont want to stuff it up so would an e2 expert please tell me if its good to upload the e2 into my azboxhd or is it better to hold off a little longer????PS im glad there are guys out there willing to give up their time with fixing the faults with this box.

---

just ONE post before yours we asked not to ask something like this.. Have you read before post or have you just read title? this is a testing concept version...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MickeySa

Yes, put pictures here, we dont want to register on other forums ! :D

---

No need they are starting OSCAM through telnet and see it logging in.
Also ECM's are send but no picture:p

We know why and The_Ripper already answered them

If you start CCcam through telnet you probebly will see the same I didn't even tested it because I know there's a job to do

Still for the team:respect-067::respect-067:

Mgcamd ecm ok.No Channel decode.

Hello,

Did anyone test 1080p? Having a premium plus I can't test myself.
Does it have an effect on zapping?

Thanks,

cimkaya

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The_Ripper

Guys , who want to change HDMI resolution to 1080 must do it manual over /etc/init.d/bootup script, edit it , you will find line

Code:

---

insmod /lib/modules/2.6.22.19-19-the_ripper/extra/em8634dvb.ko options="-analog -f PAL_BG -digital -f HDMI_720p50 -hdmi_chip SiI9030 0 14 15 100 0 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting**************0 14 15 100 0******end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting**************0 14 15 100 0******end_of_the_skype_highlighting"

---

pls change HDMI_720p50 in the line to one of this ,
HDMI_1080p50
HDMI_1080p23
HDMI_1080p24
HDMI_1080p25
HDMI_1080p29
HDMI_1080p30
save and restart

---

Would it also be possible in future to have native resolution? With native resolution I mean automatic detection of the sent / present resolution + automatic switching in this original-format (native-mode)!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by crazy2

Mgcamd ecm ok.No Channel decode.

---

CCcam ecm ok. No channel decode. (view no video)

dvb CA device not run :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cimkaya

Hello,

Did anyone test 1080p? Having a premium plus I can't test myself.
Does it have an effect on zapping?

Thanks,

cimkaya

---

Yea... its a good question and a good test to do. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kanber_kav

CCcam ecm ok. No channel decode. (view no video)

dvb CA device not run :(

---

<Turkish>Hoca,
kartlami? paylasimlami?
</Turkish>

<English>
Tested with integrated cam or sharing?
</English>

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cimkaya

<Turkish>Hoca,
kartlami? paylasimlami?
</Turkish>

<English>
Tested with integrated cam or sharing?
</English>

---

CCcam zaten paylaşım olarak çalışıyor.
Ama bende kanalıda decode ediyor tmp deki ecm.info ve ecm0.infoda kanalı decode ettiğini yazıyor ama dvb driver de eksiklik var sanırım ca sürüscüsü çalışmıyor o çalışsa kanalı gösterecek. oscam,mgcamd dede aynı sorun var. kanalı decode ediyor ama görüntü gelmiyor.

/dev/dvb/adapter0/ca0 aygıtı çalışmadıgı için yada eksik yazıldgı için görüntü ekrana gelmiyor.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kanber_kav

CCcam zaten paylaşım olarak çalışıyor.
Ama bende kanalıda decode ediyor tmp deki ecm.info ve ecm0.infoda kanalı decode ettiğini yazıyor ama dvb driver de eksiklik var sanırım ca sürüscüsü çalışmıyor o çalışsa kanalı gösterecek. oscam,mgcamd dede aynı sorun var. kanalı decode ediyor ama görüntü gelmiyor.

/dev/dvb/adapter0/ca0 aygıtı çalışmadıgı için yada eksik yazıldgı için görüntü ekrana gelmiyor.

---

Just translating:

CCcam is for sharing. I can see the channel is being decoded in ecm.info and in ecm0.info but I can't get video. It seems something is missing in dvb driver otherwise we should have video. It seems there is the same issue with oscam and mgcam.

/dev/dvb/adapter0/ca0 does not work correctly apparently.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cimkaya

Just translating:

CCcam is for sharing. I can see the channel is being decoded in ecm.info and in ecm0.info but I can't get video. It seems something is missing in dvb driver otherwise we should have video. It seems there is the same issue with oscam and mgcam.

/dev/dvb/adapter0/ca0 does not work correctly apparently.

---

"just answering your translation"

noone said it would its a FTA IMAGE , we are still in alpha testing not even beta stop asking questions about chit that is not even declared as supported . please understand the procces of development ????

@all
2 parts are missing in drivers, CA device part of DVB driver and attaching audio/video pid to Sigma DVBCSA decoding.

Just to tell, CA device part of DVB driver is finished ...
Pending second part ...

WOW! Great @The_Ripper. Thanks for the update. :)

can I just ask you a little thing?
is about you told. attaching audio/video pid to Sigma DVBCSA decoding is for what really?

Thanks once again (i will say this until you cant hear no more thanks!) :D

:)

muhahaha, The_Ripper you're the man :)

Next driver/release we're gonna be able to scan channels/open fta/and scrambled using mgcamd,oscam,cccam,mbox

mipsel. :) so great.

thank you for all

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by [0_o]

WOW! Great @The_Ripper. Thanks for the update. :)

can I just ask you a little thing?
is about you told. attaching audio/video pid to Sigma DVBCSA decoding is for what really?

Thanks once again (i will say this until you cant hear no more thanks!) :D

:)

---

i think one thing it could fix is channel scan, so we're able to scan channels again.

correct if i'm wrong...and sorry if i am.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BIGIFA

"just answering your translation"

noone said it would its a FTA IMAGE , we are still in alpha testing not even beta stop asking questions about chit that is not even declared as supported ,please understand the procces of development ????

---

Please M8, stay polite, I don't remember being impolite with you.
Please read again my post. do you see any question mark?
It is just a test report.
And now, thanks to The_Ripper and Kanber_kav :bravo-009:, we know that encryption decoding already works.
So we are not far from having an image working with fta and scrambled channels..

anyone tested internal card reader yet?
i forgot that. how is the situation?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MickeySa

Yes, put pictures here, we dont want to register on other forums ! :D

---

Promised photos - NodiSa panel v0.2

NodiSa - panel, the E2 by Mower...

System-Information

- Image-Info
- NodiSa Panel Info
- Accessories
- Ping Test
- Restart Reboot
etc...

Regards

I see on your foto´s subtitle player from dd (one off the best plugin for my Dm) is this working ?
Hope to test soon with premium+ !

and it begins :)
something says to me this is gonna have huge support.
(enigma 2 in azbox hd) better machine then dm800. several tuners. full codec support.
we can't expect nothing but awesomeness from The_Ripper and team :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hfmls

anyone tested internal card reader yet?
i forgot that. how is the situation?

---

It's simple: the use of the reader is left to oscam etc.. they use a driver inside their code for doing this. They expect commands from tuner and send results back to it to decode and tuner will send images to videocard. This 2 comunications are made with the 2 modules ca and sigma and the ripper is working on them. So the card reader is the only thing we can forget for now. If The_ripper will fix ca and sigma it will work automatically I think. :respect-055:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DragontearS

It's simple: the use of the reader is left to oscam etc.. they use a driver inside their code for doing this. They expect commands from tuner and send results back to it to decode and tuner will send images to videocard. This 2 comunications are made with the 2 modules ca and sigma and the ripper is working on them. So the card reader is the only thing we can forget for now. If The_ripper will fix ca and sigma it will work automatically I think. :respect-055:

---

No i don't think so. There need to be a driver for the card reader. So oscam, ccam etc can use it. I don't think this driver is written yet, and I think it has a low prio.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sattommy

No i don't think so. There need to be a driver for the card reader. So oscam, ccam etc can use it. I don't think this driver is written yet, and I think it has a low prio.

---

This is what I know, if I'm wrong I'm always happy to learn new things! ;)

Hello,

Don't you think that it is really time to stop asking so many (stupid) questions.

Each time something is implemented in the E2 current "kernel" it is clearly mentioned by the team behind it (The_Ripper, MickeySA, @Telesat,...).

So don't you think that when additional features / devices will be supported they will ask us to test them?

This thread is already 54 pages and all the interesting information are summarised here by Massimo1167 and, guess what, it is only 1 page long!

I know that some here like to always make posts, making feel that they have informations or that they know something when they don't, just to have their post counter increasing and then having their status changing.

I don't understand why the E2 team don't have their own writing post section here where they publish relevant informations and then force people (that won't have access to the reserved E2 section) to create their own thread to ask (stupid) questions, that we can skip more easily.

Today we are obliged to fly over all the posts in this never ending thread just to be sure that we don't miss an information from the real E2 developers.

So please just test what the Team ask us to test and stop always asking or chatting on stuff that will or will not come in the future releases. Believe me that the team know what they have to do with E2, they don't need us to tell them what to do.

Pr2

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hfmls

and it begins :)
something says to me this is gonna have huge support.
(enigma 2 in azbox hd) better machine then dm800. several tuners. full codec support.
we can't expect nothing but awesomeness from The_Ripper and team :)

---

No is not,so far the hardware have not proven better than DM800.
You forgot the many months you are suffering shortcomings??
Meanwhile,DM800 has been working without a hiccup all this time,so what's better hardware after all?
Not sure why you have to lie to show your sympathy to azbox.
For example,I am using DM800 with two tuners (dvb-s2 and dvb-s)
I believe E2 is an alternative to this box,but is going to take a while until it reach higher grounds.
Please measure yourself,sometimes your enthusiasm pushes you over the edge.
Just a friendly advice

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hfmls

i think one thing it could fix is channel scan, so we're able to scan channels again.

correct if i'm wrong...and sorry if i am.

---

Well, actually as far as I understand, this would be the part for encryption/decryption of streams.

The CA device driver which according to The_Ripper was finished is the driver for CA modules or the cardreader.

Please correct me if I'm wrong :-) I'm also just a n00b ;-)

i didn't say any lie.i have the right to have my opinion. and my opinion is that azbox is better machine than dm800, or it will be with the correct software/firmware.
the ability to have native dvbapi and all emus like a dreambox and full codec support, is a + + for me.i have the right to have my enthusiasm. and i am right when i say it's better machine, just for example, the ammount of clines u can have in cccam is completely supperior to the ones u can have in dm800. but i don't want to go that way, I'll be offtopic too much.

I'll respect PR2 and stop posting answers to which sometimes i don't know the answer for sure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kebien

No is not,so far the hardware have not proven better than DM800.
You forgot the many months you are suffering shortcomings??
Meanwhile,DM800 has been working without a hiccup all this time,so what's better hardware after all?
Not sure why you have to lie to show your sympathy to azbox.
For example,I am using DM800 with two tuners (dvb-s2 and dvb-s)
I believe E2 is an alternative to this box,but is going to take a while until it reach higher grounds.
Please measure yourself,sometimes your enthusiasm pushes you over the edge.
Just a friendly advice

---

Also The_Ripper and a few others have already explained the cpu limitations which are causing all the Azbox problems. Good hardware comes without limitations! However if you want to minimise the cost you have to make such kind of trade-offs.

Users can understand who is lying and who is not, which posts are pure hype and which are not.

@PR2
Most of the times enthusiasm leads to exaggeration.
For the first time after 1,5+ year there is some enthusiasm about this box and it doesn't come from the one it should (opensat) but from a bunch of enthusiasts like The Ripper & the team. :respect-063:
So as you can see there is a lot of enthusiasm about this project and myself, as many others, can bear the exaggeration rather than the deadly silence and neglection of the official support...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by britzolas

@PR2
Most of the times enthusiasm leads to exaggeration.
For the first time after 1,5+ year there is some enthusiasm about this box and it doesn't come from the one it should (opensat) but from a bunch of enthusiasts like The Ripper & the team. :respect-063:
So as you can see there is a lot of enthusiasm about this project and myself, as many others, can bear the exaggeration rather than the deadly silence and neglection of the official support...

---

Finally someone who's not trying to play to policeman and has understood what a forum is. Anybody can have his own idea of a forum. My definition of a forum is a place where people can discuss, participate, give their opinion on particular subject, exchange ideas etc...
So I prefer people discussing even off-topic than "deadly" silence.

@PR2
Many people including myself suggested to have a separate Thread for only E2 team to post, but MickeySA replied that the team had no time for that.

Hi,

All I want is that people create their own thread in the forum and reserved this thread (or any new one) for the developers. I don't care to read every time the same remarks/questions in a thread that is normally there to give feedback on E2 development.

But this simple think some forum members cannot understand it, they prefer to use other people thread than creating their own one. So I am not censoring anybody, I just prefer to have clear threads with a right title and then keep discussing about the same subject in the same thread. Thisalso avoid to see 20 times the same question poping up in a very long thread.

And to clarify the situation one for all to everybody I am not an employee of Opensat I am just an end-user like you. It's not because I am moderator on the official board that I can speak in the name of Opensat, I am doing this for free.

So everything I write just reflect of my own personal opinion and not the one from Opensat. If you want a statement from Opensat ask Opensat, not me.

Pr2

P.S.: The_Ripper or MickeySA is it possible for you to create a new thread with E2, when you will have some news for us, to avoid to have a so long and the finally becoming useless thread.

I ran a simple script and found who are the enthusiasts in this thread. Check the picture attached

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jimrare

I ran a simple script and found who are the enthusiasts in this thread. Check the picture attached

---

Very nice, but has NOTHING to do with Enigma 2. :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jimrare

I ran a simple script and found who are the enthusiasts in this thread. Check the picture attached

---

Why not make a script to test zapping speed on E2 DM800 and on E2 Azbox.
So we could have a comparison... ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cimkaya

Why not make a script to test zapping speed on E2 DM800 and on E2 Azbox.
So we could have a comparison... ;)

---

Why do you need to compare the Azbox with the 800 or any other box? Get the datasheets, read them, put the boxes side by side,check the support and then compare them. Is this a comparison thread or a development one?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pr2

Hello,

Don't you think that it is really time to stop asking so many (stupid) questions.

Each time something is implemented in the E2 current "kernel" it is clearly mentioned by the team behind it (The_Ripper, MickeySA, @Telesat,...).

So don't you think that when additional features / devices will be supported they will ask us to test them?

This thread is already 54 pages and all the interesting information are summarised here by Massimo1167 and, guess what, it is only 1 page long!

I know that some here like to always make posts, making feel that they have informations or that they know something when they don't, just to have their post counter increasing and then having their status changing.

I don't understand why the E2 team don't have their own writing post section here where they publish relevant informations and then force people (that won't have access to the reserved E2 section) to create their own thread to ask (stupid) questions, that we can skip more easily.

Today we are obliged to fly over all the posts in this never ending thread just to be sure that we don't miss an information from the real E2 developers.

So please just test what the Team ask us to test and stop always asking or chatting on stuff that will or will not come in the future releases. Believe me that the team know what they have to do with E2, they don't need us to tell them what to do.

Pr2

---

holy words