This is a problem with sound when you select another track than 1st one :
1 west : Canal digital nordic - no sound when changed between audio chnls .
Cheers ,
Val .
Printable View
@GOG
I’ll try with another USB stick, but I honestly don’t think that’s the problems, since I've always removed my usb sticks correctly.
@halabessa and @GOG
So the problem should be an internet connection or a working satellite connection(TP scan)? Because I have none right now! I just moved into a new house hehehe…
@kooleracer
I disagree with you. There’s a big difference between giving feedback or just complain about something.
Guys, remember to use the bug tracker to input the bug's. This will help the team to solve them quick and also to now what to do.
PS: Before reporting a bug, first read if your bug isn't already reported.
Also, that is not a forum, so limit your self to to bug report, not to chat.
http://www.azbox-enigma.eu/bugtrac/
whats the easiest way to convert azbox dvbs.dat file to satellite.xml so you can keep current sat/transponder data for use with E2?
Telesat's AZBoxedit could go from satellite.xml -> dvbs.dat which was great for factory firmware but now need to go in reverse :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hfmls View Post
i did this to setup CrossEPG:
Enigma2 installation (dreambox)
with a unix compatible editor edit the file /usr/bin/enigma2.sh and before the line
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libopen.so.0.0 /usr/bin/enigma2
add this line
/usr/crossepg/crossepg_epgmove.sh
After reboot i went to download manually, then i reboot again, and EPG fully working.
Now only clock gets crazy
take the file
For people can't see their usb drive
Type this command in telnet for see your hardrive sda
sfdisk /dev/sda -l
Then go to ftp /etc/Code:root@AZBox:~# sfdisk /dev/sda -l
Disk /dev/sda: 60801 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track
Units = cylinders of 8225280 bytes, blocks of 1024 bytes, counting from 0
Device Boot Start End #cyls #blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 0+ 60800 60801- 488384032 c W95 FAT32 (LBA)
/dev/sda2 0 - 0 0 0 Empty
/dev/sda3 0 - 0 0 0 Empty
/dev/sda4 0 - 0 0 0 Empty
Edit fstab file and you will see something like that:
Code:rootfs / auto defaults 1 1
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
devpts /dev/pts auto mode=0620,gid=5 0 0
usbfs /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults 0 0
tmpfs /var tmpfs defaults 0 0
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults 0 0
/dev/hda2 /boot auto rw 0 0
/dev/hda3 swap swap defaults 0 0
/dev/hda5 /media/cf auto defaults 0 0
/dev/hdb1 /media/hdd auto defaults 0 0
/dev/sda1 /media/usb auto defaults 0 0]
Then change in /media/usb your sda device /dev/sda1 or sda2 sda3 sda4
@ebro
I'm not dissing anyone here. What I'm trying to tell is
while trying to fix 'fan off in standby' important bug there are some other basic major issues that weren't even mentioned on that bugtrack site. everyone know what are they. Ok. Its easy to say, Who am I and who is the_Ripper that doesn't owe me anything. I don't owe anyone here as well, k?
Now lets skip all these emotional remarks from hfmls and others and be unbiased. Just a theory - It could be very convenient for opensat to hire some guys that do some development, to get rid of their responsibilities for fw while keeping the sales up. If all this azbox-e2 stuff is just enthusiastic fun why don't you open the code for other people to get involved?
please skip all that 'you don't respect bla bla' comments for God sake you'll be wrong
Obviously, it has been confirmed this team is supported by OpenSat. See releasenotes of last firmware version.
Without this, it would probably be pretty much impossible to rewrite the drivers. This is also one of the reasons why these driver will remain proprietary.
The bugtrac system was opened today, and is only partially filled with the current bug reports so far. The current status of the firmware is still quite premature in my opinion, but a huge step forward since the first proof of concept.
I think for most users here, including me, I could say "Hope dies last". Obviously you have no confidence in this, which is absolutely fine. Either be satisfied with the current capabilities of your azbox, wait for improvement of these capabilities or sell your box and take your loss.
This thread is intended primarily for those who have faith in development of a functional E2 firmware for their azbox and I see no reason why you should barge in here to spoil this for anyone with your comments.
As I mentioned before, it's a free world, but there are probably places to find with souls more alike than in this thread.
In RTi core Beta 1.0.0 ripper thanked opensat, does anyone know what opensat give the ripper?
In what way is opensat involved in rippers work since RTi core 1.0.0?
What is your problem mate ? As far as I know all of this is for free/hobby. What will be the problem if the ripper & co get something payed for it ? At the end they are doing the job, I don't have to pay so.... I try and give my contribution by reporting bugs I notice important or not.
Maybe its just me but I dont give a **** what level of involvement Opensat have in this project, as I said before they have been remiss in their responcibilitys but what MOST people want in this thread is a decent firmware for this box! The Ripper & co are getting there bit by bit! There is some way to go but with a bit more time it is gonna be way better than official firmware! I would suggest people who are not likeminded should go irritate another forum!!
Hehe, you are talikng crap, not me.
Why should you know that? Is that something that will help you with some work so that you can contribute to this project? Or is it just a dumb question to satisfy your curiousity?
So, please tell me, why is that important right now?
Calm, calm, calm, calm calm.... Do not rise.......
wow, surprised by some of the feedback here. While lots of interesting speculation can be made with cease of factory firmware releases with simultaneous rapid dev of E2, why does anyone care whether opensat is intimately involved or just passively assisting? would anyone prefer the alternative and the factory firmware updates which advanced the platform very little? As AZBox owners, we have an opportunity to have software which can utilize the strength of the hardware and that is what should matter most. I'm personally thankful to the_ripper and team and to Opensat for whatever assistance they are providing.
I assume that 3000 post in one thread shows that there are very many dedicated people who are happy about the job being done to our AZBox right now :woot-035:
Good idea to start the Bug Tracker on azbox-enigma.eu