I went to school during the 70's/80's and from the age of about 9-16 I regularly used to get the belt - on average about once or twice a week.
For those that don't know what it is:
Code:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/annexxxcdscotland/8269988841
The first time I got it was at about 9, for spitting in the playground. I once got 6 (3 times on each hand), for calling a girl a 'dog' - which means ugly in Scotland. Sometimes everyone in the class got belted if someone did something and the teacher never knew who it was.
To be honest, you kind of got used to it after a while, I used to hear that in England, people got the Cane instead of the belt. I've never been caned so I don't know how they compared pain wise, I assume it would be more painful - however you did get different kinds of belts, some were quite thick and heavy leather with the end split into 2 parts - others were thinner and had about 6 splits in the end, the pain was different for each one.
If you got belted from the side - the belt use to wrap around your hand and get the other side as well, if you got belted head on - you sometimes used to get the wrist as well as the hand - that was quite painful.
Anyway as kids are cheeky nowadays - do you think it should be re-introduced? or some other form of physical punishment should be dished out? Kids seem to be wrapped in cotton wool nowadays and mollycoddled compared to when I was young ,and my parents had it even worse, my great granddad was a chimney sweep in the victorian days when he was boy, used to go on about - 'kids should be cleaning chimneys', 'you don't know you're born', and stuff like that - what a lot of changes in the last 100 years or so, although I do think that sometimes kids needs some punishment - maybe forcing them up chimneys is a bit too much.
Bookmarks